Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- ...ics which we can apply across various areas of work. The idea is to define metrics for the kinds of projects defined in the [[2012 Activity Plan]] which can b [[Category:Metrics]]2 KB (270 words) - 12:22, 1 June 2013
- 2 KB (325 words) - 14:49, 11 October 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Training Metrics]]30 bytes (3 words) - 12:27, 30 July 2013
Page text matches
- ...from their experience of streaming videos which they do so regularly (eg: metrics meetings). [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User tal ...eing said I don't see membership levels as being as important as the other metrics outlined above.760 KB (126,894 words) - 12:19, 21 February 2014
- ...ere]]. We will not be giving a running commentary before the strategy and metrics are open to public consultation in February, but I can say that the task fo ::Thanks Michael. The section you link to mentions metrics but not key performance indicators. It is not an automatic conclusion that429 KB (71,068 words) - 13:32, 13 April 2015
- The CEO briefly clarified the metrics. ...discussed the question of targets for next year. Do we base the target for metrics for next year using current year achievements, or a zero base system where23 KB (3,809 words) - 13:10, 2 February 2017
- ...kimedia movement. Among these, the three headline topics were performance metrics, organizational development and advocacy alliances, which highlight the dir Exploring metrics, organisational development and advocacy alliances enables us to understand11 KB (1,694 words) - 05:07, 25 November 2013
- **Insufficient tools for demonstrating metrics ...areas were identified: have clearer objectives; better reporting, clearer metrics (which would help to involve the community and increase dissemination); wor79 KB (12,042 words) - 11:30, 29 August 2014
- ...eer community, staff team and governance (measured through our demographic metrics and staff and board EDI surveys) ...ve, easy, and safe for people to engage in (measured through participation metrics and narrative evidence)38 KB (5,433 words) - 22:45, 25 April 2025
- 5. '''Metrics'''. ...ou need to consider the wider issues as well. Clearly there is a need for metrics as it is a good indicator of how we are doing and can be useful to measure5 KB (910 words) - 18:33, 2 June 2013
- ...R added that she was keen for this group to help Wikimedia UK set relevant metrics for volunteer and community engagement. It was noted that Wikimedia UK shou * Metrics9 KB (1,420 words) - 12:38, 28 June 2024
- # Enhance G5 metrics to add count of the non-WMUK Wikimedia events that are advertised through t ...r charitable ''impact. ''We are keen to evaluate our programs, and develop metrics around this including for cohorts. However, at this stage we intend to make20 KB (3,144 words) - 11:18, 10 March 2014
- ...ve made to enhance our governance, develop our strategy, create meaningful metrics and deliver impact for the movement. Other chapters are keen to learn from ...on and design. I gave contributions at the workshop, in the pre-conference metrics workshop, and in the Sunday chapter’s strategy session on these issues. D24 KB (3,903 words) - 22:46, 7 May 2014
- ...The Foundation is currently reviewing and revising the global metrics. The metrics requirements are being streamlined into three areas: ...r WMUK must focus on programmes that have impact and record the associated metrics.21 KB (3,277 words) - 15:45, 27 September 2016
- ...confirmed that these still felt appropriate. The board also discussed the metrics which were slightly under target and DC clarified some points relating to t Our lead volunteer metrics is 203 for the year, which DC has analysed to reveal that this represents 112 KB (2,010 words) - 17:45, 1 August 2017
- ...perational detail, getting drawn into discussions about whether one set of metrics or another is most appropriate, never agreeing, taking up lots of Board tim ...ight be more useful. So long as we were getting consistent and meaningful metrics which enabled us to make decisions on future resource allocation, that woul8 KB (1,307 words) - 22:18, 6 June 2013
- ...itative analysis of the charity’s progress towards our strategic goals and metrics in the first quarter of the year. ...have been replaced by three shared grant metrics (GM 1 - 3) and two grant metrics defined by Wikimedia UK (GM 4 - 5).5 KB (794 words) - 10:51, 15 September 2017
- ...ty has undertaken during the past year, in many cases exceeding the global metrics agreed with the Wikimedia Foundation, our core funder. High-level partnersh LCR outlined the work over the past year explaining that in terms of global metrics set by the WMF the UK Charity performed well, engaging with 600 rolling act14 KB (2,182 words) - 20:57, 3 July 2019
- |Evidence that it’s working + Who are we reaching (Metrics) |Evidence that it’s working + Who are we reaching (Metrics)11 KB (1,535 words) - 16:07, 30 October 2020
- ===Project Metrics and measurement. (CK) [10m]=== ...se to see what is successful, and to include in our reports. See [[Project Metrics]] for ideas. RS suggested that the Events Organiser could be involved heavi17 KB (2,849 words) - 12:00, 31 July 2014
- ...kimedia community, partner organisations, and other stakeholders. Our main metrics here are the overall number of members, the number of members participating * To have achieved (90%?) membership satisfaction on key metrics31 KB (4,785 words) - 21:32, 12 July 2012
- | valign="top" | [[#S3E|'''GLAM-Metrics: Measuring the Impact of Openness''']] ===={{anchor|S3E}} GLAM-Metrics: Measuring the Impact of Openness ====30 KB (4,393 words) - 13:53, 30 May 2016
- ...lear line of sight to Wikimedia’s strategic objectives; and of course, the metrics must also be ‘SMART’.6 KB (995 words) - 17:47, 6 June 2013