Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- ...out until it was too late. [[User:LondonStatto|LondonStatto]] ([[User talk:LondonStatto|talk]]) 08:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC) ...M coincide with Wikimania. [[User:LondonStatto|LondonStatto]] ([[User talk:LondonStatto|talk]]) 08:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)9 KB (1,444 words) - 16:22, 29 June 2013
- [21:08] LondonStatto left the chat room. [21:08] LondonStatto joined the chat room.43 KB (6,419 words) - 20:00, 8 April 2009
- [21:26] LondonStatto left the chat room. (Client Quit) [20:34] LondonStatto: if Andrew's only 10 minutes delayed on a train, he's quite lucky!71 KB (10,906 words) - 21:13, 2 March 2009
- [20:33] LondonStatto joined the chat room. [21:23] LondonStatto left the chat room. (Connection timed out)31 KB (4,703 words) - 01:28, 7 May 2009
- Can someone respond to my post at [[User talk:LondonStatto/Proposed STV Election Rules#Details of the system]]. I think it is essenti ...ing. I'm looking for something similar to my bullet points at [[User talk:LondonStatto/Proposed STV Election Rules#Details of the system]], except written by peop760 KB (126,894 words) - 11:19, 21 February 2014
- # [[User:LondonStatto|LondonStatto]] ([[User talk:LondonStatto|talk]]) 10:58, 18 March 2013 (UTC)6 KB (865 words) - 14:27, 10 September 2013
- [2009-03-10 20:40:25] <AndrewRT> he's here - LondonStatto - if you want to ask him any questions [2009-03-10 21:28:16] |<-- LondonStatto has left chat.freenode.net (Client Quit)79 KB (11,775 words) - 14:05, 12 March 2009
- ...t wouldn't be suitable for us. There is a first draft of a proposal [[User:LondonStatto/Proposed EGM Motion on Voting System|here]] and was some discussion last we ::And, cutting to the chase, a proposal at [[User:LondonStatto/Proposed STV Election Rules]] (oops, as Tom lked to above), which I am so f232 KB (38,358 words) - 18:35, 13 August 2022
- # [[User:LondonStatto|LondonStatto]] 00:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)11 KB (1,441 words) - 16:15, 7 July 2014
- #[[User:LondonStatto|LondonStatto]] 09:48, 10 February 2011 (UTC)9 KB (1,224 words) - 14:17, 7 May 2020
- # [[User:LondonStatto|LondonStatto]]623 bytes (92 words) - 18:33, 2 December 2010
- [20:46] LondonStatto left the chat room. (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) [20:46] LondonStatto left the chat room. (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))66 KB (9,836 words) - 20:01, 8 April 2009
- #LondonStatto - already a member7 KB (1,013 words) - 17:27, 25 July 2012
- # [[User:LondonStatto]]375 bytes (48 words) - 18:39, 20 June 2019
- # [[User:LondonStatto|James Farrar]]8 KB (1,115 words) - 22:21, 28 January 2013
- ...system, instead amends the [[Election Rules]] on the basis proposed [[User:LondonStatto/Proposed STV Election Rules|here]]. The difference from the current electio14 KB (2,182 words) - 18:02, 9 April 2013
- ...the discussion around changing how Trustees should be elected [[wmuk:User:LondonStatto/Proposed STV Election Rules| here]]''21 KB (3,481 words) - 14:38, 17 January 2014