Talk:Vision, values and mission (proposed)
OKF sources
When did the charity accept the Open Knowledge Foundation's definitions, is this in a past vote of members or is it a change to our Articles? Note, our Articles use the term "open content" not "open knowledge". Personally, I have never reviewed the OKF's definitions, nor been asked to. --Fæ (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Fundamental change to limit the charity to "education"
This proposal includes a radical change of scope for Wikimedia UK, from:
- Wikimedia UK’s mission is to help people and organisations build and preserve open knowledge to share and use freely.
to:
- Our vision is educational Open Knowledge for all.
- Our mission is to help people and organisations create and preserve educational Open Knowledge, and to help provide easy access for all.
This change is emphasised in the values as "We promote the provision of high quality educational Open Knowledge to all.".
This drops from the charity's mission the preservation of open knowledge outside of "education" and potentially limits all future projects for the charity to those that provide high quality and "educational" open knowledge (as defined by the OKF, rather than the WMF or Wikimedia projects). This is a radical change which could see WMUK refusing to fund Commons upload projects, or Wikimedia content creation projects that were not judged to be of sufficiently "high quality" or of sufficient "educational" value. For example Wiki Loves Monuments is good for public engagement but tends to provide a mass of non-high quality photos, similarly an editathon at a school would be highly likely to mostly generate content for Wikipedia articles of interest to teenagers but would have almost no true "educational" content. --Fæ (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Wikimedia UK is no longer free
The current Mission of the charity includes "use freely" and "free and open licences". This proposal removes the concept of "free" entirely. This is a significant difference between free access and open access or free software and open software; namely this leaves the charity in a position to promote licences and software for which there is no free re-use, nor any free access. Why would the members of the charity want this change? --Fæ (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC)