User talk:AndrewRT

Lovely Wikipedia

Thanks for your comment about the Lovely Wikipedia event. I am not sure about splitting the events. It's a shame we could not discuss it yesterday. I'm sure we'll sort something out soon enough!Harrypotter 00:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I've commented on the project page - hope we can meet up to discuss soon. 155.202.254.82 13:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Project Proposals

On this page you made the comment Daft I know - that's the consequence of the idiots we've got in parliament. AndrewRT 23:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC). While it may be your deeply held personal opinion I do believe you should remove it, as it is not likely to help secure public sector funding, when the proposal is researched. It frankly brings the project into disrepute. I don't believe you can prove causality, or sustain the allegation, so it should be left unsaid.. Having worked with children in the voluntary sector and in schools for over 30 years- I cannot emphasise enough the seriousness that is attacted to Criminal Record checks and the blight it has caused. But anyone working in schools, sports, scouts has to accept the policy and support it before access is gained. Success with a schools project requires the assistance and support of the local authorities and HM government. That is the way it is done in the UK. Even the personal staff of the PM now understand the consequences of ill considered postings. When you have read this comment feel free to delete it so we can keep an upbeat positive note to the new projects. --ClemRutter 14:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)