Talk:Editathon, British Library/June 2011: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(enjoy :) \) |
(→Further query about photos: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I just wanted to say that this sounds amazing, and I'm sorry I can't be there. Have fun! -- [[User:Phoebe|Phoebe]] 20:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | I just wanted to say that this sounds amazing, and I'm sorry I can't be there. Have fun! -- [[User:Phoebe|Phoebe]] 20:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Further query about photos == | |||
Is there a general policy from the BL about taking (non-flash) photographs of documents for research purposes? I am thinking of examples where it might be handy for an editor to be able to refer to their sample pocket camera photos for later updating (or verification) of article content rather than the scenario of adding photos of documents to Commons. For me, this would mean I could fit a lot more into a day rather than relying on my hand-written notes. --[[Special:Contributions/82.132.139.212|82.132.139.212]] 12:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:42, 4 January 2011
I just wanted to say that this sounds amazing, and I'm sorry I can't be there. Have fun! -- Phoebe 20:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Further query about photos
Is there a general policy from the BL about taking (non-flash) photographs of documents for research purposes? I am thinking of examples where it might be handy for an editor to be able to refer to their sample pocket camera photos for later updating (or verification) of article content rather than the scenario of adding photos of documents to Commons. For me, this would mean I could fit a lot more into a day rather than relying on my hand-written notes. --82.132.139.212 12:42, 4 January 2011 (UTC)