User talk:Tango: Difference between revisions
(→Joining online: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Do you foresee even the remotest possibility that BBC Radio 5 Live are interested in ownership of 3.5 minutes of discussion of Wikipedia on one of their multi-hour long shows? I suggest we give the discussion better attribution + links to the Radio 5 Live website and a link to the individual show's website (if there is one). Fair use would easily come into it given the tiny proportion of the show that's relevant, but they wouldn't give one iota of a damn about it. What do you think? Also, this needs to be resolved quite quickly because I have also been asked to transcribe the Newsnight piece. But that will be taken down from the iPlayer in about five days. I'm obviously not going to do it if it's not going to be used. --[[User:Bodnotbod|Bodnotbod]] 22:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | Do you foresee even the remotest possibility that BBC Radio 5 Live are interested in ownership of 3.5 minutes of discussion of Wikipedia on one of their multi-hour long shows? I suggest we give the discussion better attribution + links to the Radio 5 Live website and a link to the individual show's website (if there is one). Fair use would easily come into it given the tiny proportion of the show that's relevant, but they wouldn't give one iota of a damn about it. What do you think? Also, this needs to be resolved quite quickly because I have also been asked to transcribe the Newsnight piece. But that will be taken down from the iPlayer in about five days. I'm obviously not going to do it if it's not going to be used. --[[User:Bodnotbod|Bodnotbod]] 22:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:It is the whole of one item, so I'm not sure fair use would cover it. It would be best if we just contact the BBC and get their permission. David Gerrard will have the contact details. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 23:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | :It is the whole of one item, so I'm not sure fair use would cover it. It would be best if we just contact the BBC and get their permission. David Gerrard will have the contact details. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 23:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Joining online == | |||
You may like to know that the online application [http://donate.wikimedia.org.uk/index.php?option=com_civicrm&view=Contributions&Itemid=57| link] is not working. I do have a paper application form somewhere, but I am more likely to join if I can do it online. [[User:Grafen|Grafen]] 08:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:26, 6 June 2010
I should find any messages left for me here, but if it's urgent please leave a note on my English Wikipedia talk page.
Congratulations, you're now an admin! Mike Peel 14:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Transcript
Do you foresee even the remotest possibility that BBC Radio 5 Live are interested in ownership of 3.5 minutes of discussion of Wikipedia on one of their multi-hour long shows? I suggest we give the discussion better attribution + links to the Radio 5 Live website and a link to the individual show's website (if there is one). Fair use would easily come into it given the tiny proportion of the show that's relevant, but they wouldn't give one iota of a damn about it. What do you think? Also, this needs to be resolved quite quickly because I have also been asked to transcribe the Newsnight piece. But that will be taken down from the iPlayer in about five days. I'm obviously not going to do it if it's not going to be used. --Bodnotbod 22:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- It is the whole of one item, so I'm not sure fair use would cover it. It would be best if we just contact the BBC and get their permission. David Gerrard will have the contact details. --Tango 23:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Joining online
You may like to know that the online application link is not working. I do have a paper application form somewhere, but I am more likely to join if I can do it online. Grafen 08:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)