User:Deryck Chan/2016 AGM talk: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deryck Chan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Deryck Chan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Guide to voting and consensus (WMUK 2016).pdf|thumb|Slides here]] | |||
Let's say, 4 minutes, 20 seconds per slide | Let's say, 4 minutes, 20 seconds per slide | ||
# Consensus and voting (title slide) | # Consensus and voting (title slide) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
# Complications: What's the appropriate weighting? (Canvassing? Strength of argument? Well-respected editors in a particular topic should be given more weight?) Discussions with multiple outcomes? | # Complications: What's the appropriate weighting? (Canvassing? Strength of argument? Well-respected editors in a particular topic should be given more weight?) Discussions with multiple outcomes? | ||
# But for now, this is an appropriate model | # But for now, this is an appropriate model | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 6 July 2016
Let's say, 4 minutes, 20 seconds per slide
- Consensus and voting (title slide)
- About me - civil engineer, Wikimedian, attends Wikimanias
- On-wiki: deletion discussions
- Problem: Delete or not delete
- "Consensus is not voting"
- But full consensus is almost never possible
- ...and when you make mistakes, you get taken to DRV
- So after almost 10 years of being admin, here's the model I've boiled down to...
- 1/3 - 1/2 - 2/3
- "Weighted voting"
- Complications: What's the appropriate weighting? (Canvassing? Strength of argument? Well-respected editors in a particular topic should be given more weight?) Discussions with multiple outcomes?
- But for now, this is an appropriate model