Talk:2016 Strategy Consultation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(cm) |
(fmt) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:"through the democratic creation" | :"through the democratic creation" | ||
:wikipedia is not a democracy | :wikipedia is not a democracy | ||
[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST) | |||
Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look... | ::Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look... [[User:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) ]] ([[User talk:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) |talk]]) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST) | ||
::[[:en:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY|WP:NOTDEMOCRACY]] refers to Wikipedia's governance rather than the process of content creation. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:10, 17 May 2016 (BST) | ::[[:en:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY|WP:NOTDEMOCRACY]] refers to Wikipedia's governance rather than the process of content creation. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:10, 17 May 2016 (BST) | ||
:Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST) | :Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST) | ||
Good point | ::Good point [[User:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) ]] ([[User talk:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) |talk]]) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST) | ||
:Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST) | :Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST) | ||
I wonder if these functions would fit better under strategic goal 3? | ::I wonder if these functions would fit better under strategic goal 3? | ||
Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment. | ::Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment. [[User:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK)|LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) ]] ([[User talk:LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) |talk]]) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 10:12, 17 May 2016
Thing to consider
- "through the democratic creation"
- wikipedia is not a democracy
Geni (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST)
- Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look... LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)
- WP:NOTDEMOCRACY refers to Wikipedia's governance rather than the process of content creation. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 10:10, 17 May 2016 (BST)
- Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.Geni (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST)
- Good point LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)
- Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.Geni (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST)
- I wonder if these functions would fit better under strategic goal 3?
- Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment. LucyCrompton-Reid (WMUK) (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2016 (BST)