Talk:2016 Strategy Consultation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Thing to consider) |
(Response to comments) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:"through the democratic creation" | :"through the democratic creation" | ||
:wikipedia is not a democracy | :wikipedia is not a democracy | ||
Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look... | |||
[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST) | [[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST) | ||
:Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST) | :Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST) | ||
Good point | |||
:Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST) | :Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.[[User:Geni|Geni]] ([[User talk:Geni|talk]]) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST) | ||
I wonder if these functions would fit better under strategic goal 3? | |||
Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment. | |||
Revision as of 10:08, 17 May 2016
Thing to consider
- "through the democratic creation"
- wikipedia is not a democracy
Perhaps 'shared creation of' would be better here? Will take another look...
Geni (talk) 22:13, 16 May 2016 (BST)
- Uses the term open knowledge a lot without really ever defining it.Geni (talk) 23:48, 16 May 2016 (BST)
Good point
- Strategic goal 2 lacks any involvement for those trying to perform a curation function like QOAM or the DOAJ Seal.Geni (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2016 (BST)
I wonder if these functions would fit better under strategic goal 3?
Thanks for the feedback Geni, will consider in more detail when I'm looking at all the feedback. I appreciate you taking the time to comment.