Talk:Press releases/Ofqual report: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Articles covering this story) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: They might publish a letter to the Editor. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 20:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | : They might publish a letter to the Editor. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 20:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::True. We should probably do both, then. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 20:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | ::True. We should probably do both, then. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 20:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Articles covering this story == | |||
* [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6943325/Schoolchildren-told-to-avoid-Wikipedia.html Telegraph] | |||
* [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5h-XlAS4YCNvyUIDE8w7ZjYIagGWw UKPA] | |||
Revision as of 23:30, 6 January 2010
Do you really think the Telegraph would do anything in response to such a letter? --Tango 20:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- They might publish a letter to the Editor. Mike Peel 20:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- True. We should probably do both, then. --Tango 20:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC)