Working groups: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
new
 
add info
Line 8: Line 8:
''Remit:''
''Remit:''


* To act as a focal point for working groups for specific programmes;
* To act as a conduit for a broad base of interested parties, including non-Wikimedians with relevant expertise;
* To provide specialist and technical advice in connection with the groups' areas of interest;
* To provide specialist and technical advice in connection with the groups' areas of interest;
* To provide assistance with project incubation;
* To provide assistance with project incubation;
* To act as a conduit for a broad base of interested parties, including non-Wikimedians with relevant expertise;
* To engage and support our community, and to encourage and develop volunteer participation;
* To engage and support our community, and to encourage and develop volunteer participation;
* To develop and grow our network of contacts and volunteers;
* To develop and grow our network of contacts and volunteers.
* To act as a focal point for working groups for specific programmes
 
Working groups should be open, welcoming, entirely flexible as to membership, and can be formed whenever a group of volunteers thinks that working in a focused way would be useful or interesting.  Groups would normally be permanent, unless some volunteers wanted to set up a temporary group for some time-limited task. Members needn't be subject specialists, but should have a common interest in some area of work, and a desire to work with the charity and other volunteers towards a common aim. The group itself would define that aim, and could change it whenever they wanted. Groups can and indeed should be flexible in what they focus on, and if a group wants to address multiple topics or to dive into some specific area that should be fine


One obvious working group would be tech/software, but there may be any number of others if there is sufficient volunteer enthusiasm - eg GLAM, education, expert outreach, training, advocacy, press and communications, photography, website/wiki development.
One obvious working group would be tech/software, but there may be any number of others if there is sufficient volunteer enthusiasm - eg GLAM, education, expert outreach, training, advocacy, press and communications, photography, website/wiki development.

Revision as of 06:54, 7 June 2015

Template:Volunteering

Members (can be flexible): Volunteers, project coordinators (staff)

Reporting to: CEO, Evaluation panel

Remit:

  • To act as a focal point for working groups for specific programmes;
  • To act as a conduit for a broad base of interested parties, including non-Wikimedians with relevant expertise;
  • To provide specialist and technical advice in connection with the groups' areas of interest;
  • To provide assistance with project incubation;
  • To engage and support our community, and to encourage and develop volunteer participation;
  • To develop and grow our network of contacts and volunteers.

Working groups should be open, welcoming, entirely flexible as to membership, and can be formed whenever a group of volunteers thinks that working in a focused way would be useful or interesting. Groups would normally be permanent, unless some volunteers wanted to set up a temporary group for some time-limited task. Members needn't be subject specialists, but should have a common interest in some area of work, and a desire to work with the charity and other volunteers towards a common aim. The group itself would define that aim, and could change it whenever they wanted. Groups can and indeed should be flexible in what they focus on, and if a group wants to address multiple topics or to dive into some specific area that should be fine

One obvious working group would be tech/software, but there may be any number of others if there is sufficient volunteer enthusiasm - eg GLAM, education, expert outreach, training, advocacy, press and communications, photography, website/wiki development.