IT Development/Launchpad: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(more)
Line 3: Line 3:
== Objectives ==
== Objectives ==
* Wikimedia UK would like to make a positive impact on the success of the Wikimedia mission through the targeted use of its resources to support technology projects.
* Wikimedia UK would like to make a positive impact on the success of the Wikimedia mission through the targeted use of its resources to support technology projects.
* It would also be useful for the charity to cultivate an evidence basis of the positive impact it can make, in order to galvanise both volunteer and institutional support. Wikimedia Deutschland provides one example of how this process can work.
* It would also be useful for the charity to cultivate an evidence basis of the positive impact it can make, in order to galvanise both volunteer and institutional support. Wikimedia Deutschland (and its association with the Toolserver) provides one example of how this process can work.
* However, it will be necessary to balance the charity's long term ambitions with its short term resource constraints in a way that maximises value for money but does not appear to mislead or otherwise treat stakeholders unfairly.
* However, it will be necessary to balance the charity's long term ambitions with its short term resource constraints in a way that maximises value for money but does not appear to mislead or otherwise treat stakeholders unfairly.



Revision as of 15:20, 2 February 2015

Comment This is a proposed policy that has not yet been approved. Please offer any feedback on the talk page.

Objectives

  • Wikimedia UK would like to make a positive impact on the success of the Wikimedia mission through the targeted use of its resources to support technology projects.
  • It would also be useful for the charity to cultivate an evidence basis of the positive impact it can make, in order to galvanise both volunteer and institutional support. Wikimedia Deutschland (and its association with the Toolserver) provides one example of how this process can work.
  • However, it will be necessary to balance the charity's long term ambitions with its short term resource constraints in a way that maximises value for money but does not appear to mislead or otherwise treat stakeholders unfairly.

Core pitch

  • The creation of a central location and branding for Wikimedia UK's technology portfolio. Initially, this would be populated with a small number of existing case studies. This would be low cost and could lean on existing communications expertise, rather than trying to reinvent the wheel.
  • Possible names, drawn from similar activities undertaken by others, include Launchpad[1], Incubator[2], Catapult[3] or Nursery[4].

Notes

  1. A possible conflict with Launchpad, but not an overly problematic one.
  2. Likely to conflict with the Wikimedia Incubator.
  3. Used for Government-sponsored projects, e.g. https://digital.catapult.org.uk/
  4. In the sense of a garden nursery. May not translate.