UK monitoring programme: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (ce) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
How such measures are done vary based on what is doable now and what we should be aiming to do in the future. | How such measures are done vary based on what is doable now and what we should be aiming to do in the future. | ||
* Activity and edits of active UK editors http://wikiproject.oii.ox.ac.uk/mapping_wikipedia/#lang=ar,arz,en,fa,fr,he,sw&map=words&loc=GBR | * Activity and edits of active UK editors http://wikiproject.oii.ox.ac.uk/mapping_wikipedia/#lang=ar,arz,en,fa,fr,he,sw&map=words&loc=GBR | ||
* Quantity of UK related wikipedia articles http://tracemedia.co.uk/terra/ maybe also http://wikilocation.org/documentation/ | * Quantity of UK related wikipedia articles https://wdq.wmflabs.org/api?q=around[625,52.205,0.119,15] or https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GeoData#API <small> http://tracemedia.co.uk/terra/ maybe also http://wikilocation.org/documentation/</small> | ||
* Quality of UK related wikipedia articles: presumably a query subsetting ^ | ** Quality of UK related wikipedia articles: presumably a query subsetting based on project class ^ | ||
** Subset of ^ based on different language versions | |||
* Smaller list - items geolocated to UK, with "nolink" .en (i.e. objects with an article in another language but not English) | |||
* number of UK related images see e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Geocoding | * number of UK related images see e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Geocoding | ||
* Quality of UK related image: presumably a query subsetting ^ - you'd want a comparison with the full set (so, percentage of UK related images of a particular quality, compared to that percentage from the subset of any geolocated images) | * Quality of UK related image: presumably a query subsetting ^ - you'd want a comparison with the full set (so, percentage of UK related images of a particular quality, compared to that percentage from the subset of any geolocated images) | ||
Revision as of 13:43, 12 August 2014
Through all of our programmes, we need to ensure that we are having a positive impact not just on the wider projects but on articles, editors, topics that fall within our geography. The idea is that this is to judge the health of the UK's presence on the wikimedia projects. The idea is that this method of practice can be duplicated across other geographies and chapters to allow other communities to monitor the health of their communities.
Things we need to know
- Number of active UK editors
- Demographics of active UK editors
- Activity and edits of active UK editors
- Quantity of UK related wikipedia articles
- Quality of UK related wikipedia articles
- Language coverage of wikipedia articles
- Quality of multi-language wikipedia articles
- number of UK related images
- Quality of UK related image
- UK GLAM coverage (and reputations)
- UK barriers to access reduction (reach increased, QRCodes, Kiwix, etc)
How to do this
How such measures are done vary based on what is doable now and what we should be aiming to do in the future.
- Activity and edits of active UK editors http://wikiproject.oii.ox.ac.uk/mapping_wikipedia/#lang=ar,arz,en,fa,fr,he,sw&map=words&loc=GBR
- Quantity of UK related wikipedia articles https://wdq.wmflabs.org/api?q=around[625,52.205,0.119,15] or https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:GeoData#API http://tracemedia.co.uk/terra/ maybe also http://wikilocation.org/documentation/
- Quality of UK related wikipedia articles: presumably a query subsetting based on project class ^
- Subset of ^ based on different language versions
- Smaller list - items geolocated to UK, with "nolink" .en (i.e. objects with an article in another language but not English)
- number of UK related images see e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Geocoding
- Quality of UK related image: presumably a query subsetting ^ - you'd want a comparison with the full set (so, percentage of UK related images of a particular quality, compared to that percentage from the subset of any geolocated images)
TO BE CONTINUED