Talk:Access control approval guidelines/Proposed revision June 2014: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Board wiki: sorted)
(r - apols for typo!)
Line 8: Line 8:
:For added clarity it might be worth splitting the "Trustees and volunteers" section into separate ones, but this change would not (as I read it) result in any material changes. [[user:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] (talk: [[user talk:Thryduulf|local]] | [[w:user talk:Thryduulf|en.wp]] | [[wikt:user talk:Thryduulf|en.wikt]]) 10:57, 14 May 2014 (BST)
:For added clarity it might be worth splitting the "Trustees and volunteers" section into separate ones, but this change would not (as I read it) result in any material changes. [[user:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] (talk: [[user talk:Thryduulf|local]] | [[w:user talk:Thryduulf|en.wp]] | [[wikt:user talk:Thryduulf|en.wikt]]) 10:57, 14 May 2014 (BST)
::It has been [https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Access_control_approval_guidelines%2FProposed_revision_June_2014&diff=56771&oldid=56770 resolved]. It was a copy and pasting error. That particular portion of text related to trustees rather than staff as denoted by the header immediately above. Thank you to Fae for pointing out this discrepancy, and to Michael for fixing it. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:08, 14 May 2014 (BST)
::It has been [https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Access_control_approval_guidelines%2FProposed_revision_June_2014&diff=56771&oldid=56770 resolved]. It was a copy and pasting error. That particular portion of text related to trustees rather than staff as denoted by the header immediately above. Thank you to Fae for pointing out this discrepancy, and to Michael for fixing it. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:08, 14 May 2014 (BST)
:::: Argh! Sorry about that :( - good spot, keep 'em coming! [[User:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|Katherine Bavage (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Katherine Bavage (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:51, 14 May 2014 (BST)

Revision as of 11:51, 14 May 2014

Board wiki

My understanding, from when I was a trustee, was that the Board wiki was restricted to trustees and would never be accessed by employees.

I made a confidential declaration to my fellow trustees on that wiki, along with other matters, that I do not give permission to be released to any employee or contractor. I would consider specifically releasing pages, or having them deleted on a case by case basis.

If this is an intentional change by the current board of trustees, then all past trustees and directors who contributed to the board wiki should be informed and invited to comment before any change to the privacy of this information is made. Thanks -- (talk) 18:50, 13 May 2014 (BST)

Can you point to where this change is in the document, please. The only mention of the board wiki I can spot is in the list of what access will be granted to trustees: "Generally, for new trustees the following access will be granted as standard: [...] Office and Board Wiki.".
For added clarity it might be worth splitting the "Trustees and volunteers" section into separate ones, but this change would not (as I read it) result in any material changes. Thryduulf (talk: local | en.wp | en.wikt) 10:57, 14 May 2014 (BST)
It has been resolved. It was a copy and pasting error. That particular portion of text related to trustees rather than staff as denoted by the header immediately above. Thank you to Fae for pointing out this discrepancy, and to Michael for fixing it. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:08, 14 May 2014 (BST)
Argh! Sorry about that :( - good spot, keep 'em coming! Katherine Bavage (WMUK) (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2014 (BST)