Talk:Non-board committees: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Recognized?: Dec I think)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Volunteer?==
==Volunteer?==
Other committees such as the ARC are volunteer driven, unless we consider that trustees are not volunteers. Should these other committees be recognized as a volunteer committee with delegated powers and a separately defined scope, rather than making it seem that they are not volunteer committees? --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 15:15, 7 May 2014 (BST)
Other committees such as the ARC are volunteer driven, unless we consider that trustees are not volunteers. Should these other committees be recognized as a volunteer committee with delegated powers and a separately defined scope, rather than making it seem that they are not volunteer committees? --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 15:15, 7 May 2014 (BST)
:The board committees have their own separate charters, which I think is right given their very different roles. So, while you are right that those are indeed volunteer (trustee) led, it makes sense to deal with them separately.  --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 15:34, 7 May 2014 (BST)


==Recognized?==
==Recognized?==
The documents lists four volunteer committees which are recognized by the board. Are there minutes of a board meeting that document this happening? --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 15:15, 7 May 2014 (BST)
The documents lists four volunteer committees which are recognized by the board. Are there minutes of a board meeting that document this happening? --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 15:15, 7 May 2014 (BST)
:If I remember rightly, the December board. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 15:30, 7 May 2014 (BST)
:If I remember rightly, the December board. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 15:30, 7 May 2014 (BST)

Revision as of 15:34, 7 May 2014

Volunteer?

Other committees such as the ARC are volunteer driven, unless we consider that trustees are not volunteers. Should these other committees be recognized as a volunteer committee with delegated powers and a separately defined scope, rather than making it seem that they are not volunteer committees? -- (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2014 (BST)

The board committees have their own separate charters, which I think is right given their very different roles. So, while you are right that those are indeed volunteer (trustee) led, it makes sense to deal with them separately. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:34, 7 May 2014 (BST)

Recognized?

The documents lists four volunteer committees which are recognized by the board. Are there minutes of a board meeting that document this happening? -- (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2014 (BST)

If I remember rightly, the December board. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2014 (BST)