File talk:WMUK operational model.svg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Outcome measures and impact: typo) |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (→Outcome measures and impact: re to Yaris678) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Outcome measures and impact== | ==Outcome measures and impact== | ||
Why is there a direct arrow from outcome measures to impact? [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 22:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | Why is there a direct arrow from outcome measures to impact? [[User:Yaris678|Yaris678]] ([[User talk:Yaris678|talk]]) 22:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Because we define impact as 'the cumulative permanent or structural effect of the various Outcome Measures that we achieve over time' - see [[Strategic and operational models]]. There are quite a few outcome measures we can track (such as number of files having quality image status on Commons) which directly relate to our impact in respect of one of the goals (G1.2 The quality of Open Content continues to improve). In other cases, we cannot measure outcomes directly and have to go via the less desirable route of measuring outputs. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 08:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:50, 16 February 2014
Outcome measures and impact
Why is there a direct arrow from outcome measures to impact? Yaris678 (talk) 22:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Because we define impact as 'the cumulative permanent or structural effect of the various Outcome Measures that we achieve over time' - see Strategic and operational models. There are quite a few outcome measures we can track (such as number of files having quality image status on Commons) which directly relate to our impact in respect of one of the goals (G1.2 The quality of Open Content continues to improve). In other cases, we cannot measure outcomes directly and have to go via the less desirable route of measuring outputs. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
