Talk:Membership/Rules: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(already in the AoA?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we have something official here about "Possible reasons for rejection of application"? [[User:AndrewRT|AndrewRT]] 18:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | Should we have something official here about "Possible reasons for rejection of application"? [[User:AndrewRT|AndrewRT]] 18:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
: We could do, but we already state in the AoA that "The Directors may only refuse an application for membership if, acting reasonably and properly, they consider it to be in the best interests of the charity to refuse the application." That covers the basics; the rest are really just guidelines. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 20:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | : We could do, but we already state in the AoA that "The Directors may only refuse an application for membership if, acting reasonably and properly, they consider it to be in the best interests of the charity to refuse the application." That covers the basics; the rest are really just guidelines. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 20:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I'm not sure I agree with that interpretation! I would think "in the interests of the charity" means, in practice, the Board can do pretty much what it likes! The bits in the guidance are much more restrictive. [[User:AndrewRT|AndrewRT]] 21:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:12, 12 January 2009
Should we have something official here about "Possible reasons for rejection of application"? AndrewRT 18:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- We could do, but we already state in the AoA that "The Directors may only refuse an application for membership if, acting reasonably and properly, they consider it to be in the best interests of the charity to refuse the application." That covers the basics; the rest are really just guidelines. Mike Peel 20:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I agree with that interpretation! I would think "in the interests of the charity" means, in practice, the Board can do pretty much what it likes! The bits in the guidance are much more restrictive. AndrewRT 21:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)