Microgrants/Stub Contest (prizes): Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(re)
(Ummm...is it greenlit yet? Happy to run over four weeks. If all good, will get to work on promoting it.)
Line 21: Line 21:
::That was my original thought - other folks thought shorter, but I think longer gives more bang for one's buck so to speak. I dont' think feelings are too strong any which way. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) 11:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
::That was my original thought - other folks thought shorter, but I think longer gives more bang for one's buck so to speak. I dont' think feelings are too strong any which way. [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) 11:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
:::Cas, just so you know: Katie Chan will be handling this contest this time round, rather than me - I'm too busy :-( [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 19:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
:::Cas, just so you know: Katie Chan will be handling this contest this time round, rather than me - I'm too busy :-( [[User:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|Richard Symonds (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Symonds (WMUK)|talk]]) 19:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
::::Great! Ummm...is it greenlit yet? Happy to run over four weeks. If all good, will get to work on promoting it. Cheers, [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) 09:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
<!-- Please don't remove the lines below! -->
<!-- Please don't remove the lines below! -->
[[Category:Pending microgrants]]
[[Category:Pending microgrants]]
[[Category:Microgrants for the 2013-14 financial year]]
[[Category:Microgrants for the 2013-14 financial year]]

Revision as of 10:29, 6 November 2013

Overview
  • An amount of money for vouchers as prizes for a two week contest in sometime between late November and January outlined here. The idea is that there would be (say) a £75 voucher for first prize, £50 for second, and £25 for a number of "honorable mentions". Vouchers could be for some worldwide digital organisation, such as Amazon, I-tunes or something similar. Amazon is probably the easiest.
Budget
  • See above - I guess it depends - £250 would give me a first, second and five "honourable mentions" as outlined above. The rationale for using vouchers is to distance the idea from paid editing.
Timeline
  • Three weeks for the contest, all wound up after its completion and judging.
Expected outcomes
  • To chip away at the huge number of stubs, and assist in recategorising some stubs which have since been expanded without labels being removed...and have some fun in doing so. I have also run the Core Contest, but think that the presence of some high calibre editors there might have driven away some folks - maybe a comeptition like this is less threatening and will attract a wider range of competitors.
Who I am
  • I am Casliber on english wiki, and admin, ex-arb and content editor, and very familiar with content in mainspace, which is why I am thinking this is a good idea.


Discussion
  • This sounds like a great idea to me. It's probably something that would appeal to a much larger fraction of editors than the core contest competition, and also potentially new editors, so it's probably worth advertising it much more as well, both on- and off-wiki (mention in members newsletter, blog, etc.?). It might be worth thinking about having it last a bit longer (a month perhaps?) to encourage more contributions and give less active editors more of an opportunity to enter it. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
That was my original thought - other folks thought shorter, but I think longer gives more bang for one's buck so to speak. I dont' think feelings are too strong any which way. Casliber (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Cas, just so you know: Katie Chan will be handling this contest this time round, rather than me - I'm too busy :-( Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 19:20, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Great! Ummm...is it greenlit yet? Happy to run over four weeks. If all good, will get to work on promoting it. Cheers, Casliber (talk) 09:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)