WikiConference UK 2013/Elections/Questions/Michael N Maggs: Difference between revisions
< WikiConference UK 2013 | Elections | Questions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Create) |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (→Answers: Response to question) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
************************************ --> | ************************************ --> | ||
==== Answers ==== | ==== Answers ==== | ||
1. ''What do you see as the key challenges for WMUK over the next 2-3 years, and what approaches would you advocate to meet them?'' | |||
: WMUK's main challenge over the next couple of years will be to establish its position as a substantial national charity having a respected and leading position both within the UK charity sector and also within the international Wikimedia movement. Building reputation requires an effective Board operating to the highest standards of probity that works well with the staff while avoiding the temptation to micromanage the charity's day to day operations. Building a substantial national organization requires focus on enunciating and disseminating both our vision and the benefits of membership throughout all areas of the UK, including the encouragement and support of local groups. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 12:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:40, 23 May 2013
 |
Hi there! This is the page for you to answer questions posed to you by the members of Wikimedia UK. Press the [edit] button above and then answer the questions in the box below by putting the number of the question and then your answer. |
|
Answers
1. What do you see as the key challenges for WMUK over the next 2-3 years, and what approaches would you advocate to meet them?
- WMUK's main challenge over the next couple of years will be to establish its position as a substantial national charity having a respected and leading position both within the UK charity sector and also within the international Wikimedia movement. Building reputation requires an effective Board operating to the highest standards of probity that works well with the staff while avoiding the temptation to micromanage the charity's day to day operations. Building a substantial national organization requires focus on enunciating and disseminating both our vision and the benefits of membership throughout all areas of the UK, including the encouragement and support of local groups. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:40, 23 May 2013 (UTC)