Talk:Macrogrants/The Open Digitisation Project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply) |
(→Clarity: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:That does seem to dangle so I've removed it. It was in the application forwarded to me as seen here. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | :That does seem to dangle so I've removed it. It was in the application forwarded to me as seen here. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 11:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Clarity == | |||
There is a lot written here, though I am left a bit unclear about what on this list of stuff the £2,000 worth of project developer would be doing. This would not be many paid days of work, so my assumption is that only a small sub-set of deliverables would be paid for by this grant. Perhaps a much shorter executive summary would help, along with the sub-list of outcomes the project developer would be using their paid time to produce? Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 13:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:06, 20 May 2013
"following from the" seems to be orphaned at the bottom of one of the sections, I wonder if something has been missed here? The Land (talk) 11:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- That does seem to dangle so I've removed it. It was in the application forwarded to me as seen here. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Clarity
There is a lot written here, though I am left a bit unclear about what on this list of stuff the £2,000 worth of project developer would be doing. This would not be many paid days of work, so my assumption is that only a small sub-set of deliverables would be paid for by this grant. Perhaps a much shorter executive summary would help, along with the sub-list of outcomes the project developer would be using their paid time to produce? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 13:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)