Talk:Towards a five year plan 2013-18: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Some starter questions.)
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


*How long should the plan be?
*How long should the plan be?


*Should it relate to the Foundation's Strategic Priorities?
*Should it relate to the Foundation's Strategic Priorities?


*Should it create its own strategic Priorities?
*Should it create its own strategic Priorities?


*How do we reconcile global and local community interests?
*How do we reconcile global and local community interests?


*What sort of internal structure should it have, e.g. work areas, targets, success criteria, SWOT analysis etc?
*What sort of internal structure should it have, e.g. work areas, targets, success criteria, SWOT analysis etc?


*How much depth should we look for?
*How much depth should we look for?


*What should we NOT put in?
*What should we NOT put in?


*Who should we consult and involve?
*Who should we consult and involve?


*How should we consult and involve them?
*How should we consult and involve them?


•How do we make sure it reaches the widest possible community?
 
 
*How do we make sure it reaches the widest possible community?
 
 


*How often should it be reviewed, by whom and in what ways?
*How often should it be reviewed, by whom and in what ways?

Revision as of 14:37, 7 January 2013

Some starter questions:Jon Davies (WMUK) (talk) 13:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

  • How long should the plan be?


  • Should it relate to the Foundation's Strategic Priorities?


  • Should it create its own strategic Priorities?


  • How do we reconcile global and local community interests?


  • What sort of internal structure should it have, e.g. work areas, targets, success criteria, SWOT analysis etc?


  • How much depth should we look for?


  • What should we NOT put in?


  • Who should we consult and involve?


  • How should we consult and involve them?


  • How do we make sure it reaches the widest possible community?


  • How often should it be reviewed, by whom and in what ways?