Meetings/2009-12-15/Agenda/Secretary's Report: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(+)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
# We had a letter, ccd to info-en-q@wikimedia.org, from a firm of solicitors asking us to remove some information from their client's article on Wikipedia. I suggest I reply, saying WMUK have no control over Wikipedia, but the email address should have assisted and to follow it up with the foundation if further action is requested. {{discuss}}
# We had a letter, ccd to info-en-q@wikimedia.org, from a firm of solicitors asking us to remove some information from their client's article on Wikipedia. I suggest I reply, saying WMUK have no control over Wikipedia, but the email address should have assisted and to follow it up with the foundation if further action is requested. {{discuss}}
# We also had a letter from someone referred to in a Wikipedia article asking us to remove some information about them. I suggest I reply, saying WMUK have no control over Wikipedia, but to refer to info-en-q@wikimedia.org. {{discuss}}
# We also had a letter from someone referred to in a Wikipedia article asking us to remove some information about them. I suggest I reply, saying WMUK have no control over Wikipedia, but to refer to info-en-q@wikimedia.org. {{discuss}}
[[Category:Meeting reports]]

Latest revision as of 21:26, 2 January 2013

  1. We had a letter, ccd to info-en-q@wikimedia.org, from a firm of solicitors asking us to remove some information from their client's article on Wikipedia. I suggest I reply, saying WMUK have no control over Wikipedia, but the email address should have assisted and to follow it up with the foundation if further action is requested. Dialog ballons icon.svg Discuss
  2. We also had a letter from someone referred to in a Wikipedia article asking us to remove some information about them. I suggest I reply, saying WMUK have no control over Wikipedia, but to refer to info-en-q@wikimedia.org. Dialog ballons icon.svg Discuss