Talk:IT Development/Doc: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(re) |
(+) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Even if every single site is different, requiring me to rework it for Nginx format, it will still only take half a day total. The upside is not having to use Apache :) --[[User:ErrantX|ErrantX]] ([[User talk:ErrantX|talk]]) 11:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | :Even if every single site is different, requiring me to rework it for Nginx format, it will still only take half a day total. The upside is not having to use Apache :) --[[User:ErrantX|ErrantX]] ([[User talk:ErrantX|talk]]) 11:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:: What's wrong with Apache? Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 22:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | :: What's wrong with Apache? Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 22:18, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::: Outdate/Bloated, harder to configure, painful SSL support, personal preference :) I mean, if Apache is desperately preferred I could install it, but I suspect we'd have to increase server capacity to handle it. --[[User:ErrantX|ErrantX]] ([[User talk:ErrantX|talk]]) 10:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:13, 29 November 2012
htaccess
We currently use this for most of our domains and subdomains, so migrating away from this may take a little while. But then, we have tended to use fairly simple htaccess documents, so this may not be a big job... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)