Talk:Board: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Associates: new section) |
(ce) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Associates == | == Associates == | ||
Could someone add a section for ''Associates'', presumably just listed with trustees and when | Could someone add a section for ''Associates'', presumably just listed with trustees and when retired can follow the same past year format? At the moment this is limited to Martin and his past trustee bio can be re-used. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 15:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:53, 20 September 2012
Photos
Some of the current photos of the Board members are comically bad. Perhaps at the next meetup or Board meeting, someone could bring a camera and take some new shots? It doesn't need to be a professional photographer or anything, but getting some photos where everyone is at least looking at the camera would be nice. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Knew I forgot to do something, how's the new pics? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 00:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- BTW, there's a load of photos in commons:Category:Wikimedia UK of trustees (and staff and volunteers), some categorised by board member, others just in the board meeting categories. Please take a look in there and point out if there's any better pictures that could be used! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 02:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- I've fixed mine Victuallers (talk) 10:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Associates
Could someone add a section for Associates, presumably just listed with trustees and when retired can follow the same past year format? At the moment this is limited to Martin and his past trustee bio can be re-used. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)