Talk:Submission on Communications Data Bill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deryck Chan (talk | contribs) (→"Chapter": new section) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think the "about us" section places slightly too much emphasis on our being a separate organisation from WMF, so much so that we might sound like a completely irrelevant organisation as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Is it possible to make that clearer? [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 16:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC) | I think the "about us" section places slightly too much emphasis on our being a separate organisation from WMF, so much so that we might sound like a completely irrelevant organisation as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Is it possible to make that clearer? [[User:Deryck Chan|Deryck Chan]] ([[User talk:Deryck Chan|talk]]) 16:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Indented line | |||
Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. [[User:Joscelyn|Joscelyn]] ([[User talk:Joscelyn|talk]]) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:27, 21 August 2012
Please use this page for comments before 12pm on Thursday 23 August. Thank you. --Stevie Benton (WMUK) (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
"Chapter"
I think the "about us" section places slightly too much emphasis on our being a separate organisation from WMF, so much so that we might sound like a completely irrelevant organisation as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Is it possible to make that clearer? Deryck Chan (talk) 16:51, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Indented line
Thanks - yes a fair comment - as this could use the skills of our Comms organiser who would reword that para better than I, I may defer to Stevie. Joscelyn (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)