Talk:Events: Difference between revisions
(→Geonotices on English Wikipedia: new section) |
(→Ordering?: new section) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
There's some current discussion about the guidelines at [[w:Wikipedia talk:Geonotice#Draft guideline]]. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj#top|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]]) 12:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC) | There's some current discussion about the guidelines at [[w:Wikipedia talk:Geonotice#Draft guideline]]. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">-- [[User:Trevj#top|Trevj]]</span> ([[User talk:Trevj#top|talk]]) 12:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Ordering? == | |||
Now we have so many events planned so far in advance, I think we ought to re-order this so the most imminent events are at the top. I think most people looking at this page will be thinking "what's on in the next few weeks" rather than "what's on in the middle of next year" - so it would make sense for the current month to be at the top, and then proceed chronologically forward into the future... what do people think? [[User:The Land|The Land]] ([[User talk:The Land|talk]]) 08:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:28, 18 August 2012
This layout is quite confusing - reverse chronoological for the months and chronilogical for the days. Could we be consistent? Also would be useful to add day of the week. 213.1.240.149 22:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Good point. I've changed it to be reverse chronological throughout (I think it's useful to have the current and future events at the top, whilst retaining the older events). Adding day of the week would indeed be useful; feel free to add these if you like. Alternatively, we could switch to Rock drum's system of calendars, e.g. see {{March 2011}} Mike Peel 22:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Geonotices on English Wikipedia
There's some current discussion about the guidelines at w:Wikipedia talk:Geonotice#Draft guideline. -- Trevj (talk) 12:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Ordering?
Now we have so many events planned so far in advance, I think we ought to re-order this so the most imminent events are at the top. I think most people looking at this page will be thinking "what's on in the next few weeks" rather than "what's on in the middle of next year" - so it would make sense for the current month to be at the top, and then proceed chronologically forward into the future... what do people think? The Land (talk) 08:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC)