Talk:GLAMcamp London/September 2012: Difference between revisions
Victuallers (talk | contribs) (→Decision making process: gib) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
previous GLAMcamps have shown that the decision making process is quite obscure sometimes. In order to avoid depriving non-participants of their opinion on certain questions, I propose to poll any important decision in a digital way, after the camp. The GLAMcamp could be used to prepare major propositions on a certain topic, which then could be decided upon by the global GLAM commnunity, within a reasonable period of time (e.g. 1 month). What do you think? Regards, [[User:Peter Weis|Peter Weis]] ([[User talk:Peter Weis|talk]]) 14:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC) | previous GLAMcamps have shown that the decision making process is quite obscure sometimes. In order to avoid depriving non-participants of their opinion on certain questions, I propose to poll any important decision in a digital way, after the camp. The GLAMcamp could be used to prepare major propositions on a certain topic, which then could be decided upon by the global GLAM commnunity, within a reasonable period of time (e.g. 1 month). What do you think? Regards, [[User:Peter Weis|Peter Weis]] ([[User talk:Peter Weis|talk]]) 14:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
:It depends on the decision. There are logistics that need to be decided on as early as possible and where opening the discussion widely for consultation may not be as useful as the wider community establishing a focused committee to get on with it on their behalf. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 15:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC) | :It depends on the decision. There are logistics that need to be decided on as early as possible and where opening the discussion widely for consultation may not be as useful as the wider community establishing a focused committee to get on with it on their behalf. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 15:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
==Venue== | |||
As visitors to Monmouth will know we can create a bit of a show for Wikipedia with a successful project. Similar ideas to out do Monmouth are being proposed for [[Gibraltarpedia|Gibraltar]] early next year. I would like to invite GLAMcampers to consider the idea of holding the next GLAMwiki conference in [[Gibraltar]]. I hope that you can think of ways this may happen and we will supply four or five reasons why you wouldn't consider holding it anywhere else. [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 16:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:19, 30 July 2012
GLAM and education
You might like to add the role of education projects and GLAM. We have students doing GLAM outreach in Mexico. Any grants for this event? Thelmadatter
Decision making process
Dear all,
previous GLAMcamps have shown that the decision making process is quite obscure sometimes. In order to avoid depriving non-participants of their opinion on certain questions, I propose to poll any important decision in a digital way, after the camp. The GLAMcamp could be used to prepare major propositions on a certain topic, which then could be decided upon by the global GLAM commnunity, within a reasonable period of time (e.g. 1 month). What do you think? Regards, Peter Weis (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- It depends on the decision. There are logistics that need to be decided on as early as possible and where opening the discussion widely for consultation may not be as useful as the wider community establishing a focused committee to get on with it on their behalf. --Fæ (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Venue
As visitors to Monmouth will know we can create a bit of a show for Wikipedia with a successful project. Similar ideas to out do Monmouth are being proposed for Gibraltar early next year. I would like to invite GLAMcampers to consider the idea of holding the next GLAMwiki conference in Gibraltar. I hope that you can think of ways this may happen and we will supply four or five reasons why you wouldn't consider holding it anywhere else. Victuallers (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)