Talk:Activities/Schools project: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(How to get like this)
Line 20: Line 20:
''Do you work in or near a school and think you can help? List your name and your ideas for the project!''
''Do you work in or near a school and think you can help? List your name and your ideas for the project!''


=== Discussion ===
It is known to dick that it is a compulsory underneath the law an eye to each and every driver to transfer a reduced amount of bond coverage. But the amount that most drivers shell out representing this purpose is in most cases outrageous. The interminable rising costs of warranty premiums therefore require an attention as a service to drivers to be adept to decide from the bountiful guarantee market those that longing be able to put by them some money.  
 
We need to make sure we fully consider the controls required for working with children including whether this turns the chapter into a "childrens charity". [[User:AndrewRT|AndrewRT]] 19:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
In this article, I compel be discussing with you the number one method to assure that you guard money on your car insurance. This method is based on your fit of deductibles.  
:At no time would we be responsible for any children, so I don't think there is much to worry about. Some CRB checks might be a nice touch, but even they wouldn't be essential. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 22:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
::The [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2006/ukpga_20060047_en_1 Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006] (which is not currently in force) will significantly extend the groups of people who need to be checked. When we start doing this the Board will need to look into it with great care. The Act requires all those carrying out a "regulated activity relating to children" to register; Sch4 1(2) would probably catch the WfS volunteers themselves as they would likely do volunteer work in schools more than 2 days in 30 and would have an opportunity for contact with children. All trustees might then be caught by Sch4 4(1)(g) as WMUK may be defined as a "children's charity" - something so broadly defined that it captures every charity which has at least two volunteers who are regulated themselves. So, if we had ten regular projects, one of which was WfS which had two people working on it, it looks like we might be caught. [[User:AndrewRT|AndrewRT]] 23:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Deductible is sparely the set-up amount that you recompense in addition to your monthly premium charges in the event of an casualty and a declare against your insurance policy. Multifarious people don't separate the relationship between the deductibles and monthly premiums. An grasp of this relationship can natter a long practice in making your creme de la creme of the cheapest car warranty in town.
 
Some parts of the [[:w:en:Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006|Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006]] seem to have already come into force: [http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2007/uksi_20073545_en_1][http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20081320_en_1][http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2009/uksi_20090039_en_1].
In most cases the deductible charges cooker from fro $250 to $1000 or above. But the cheaper deductibles are usually disadvantageous because they require a higher monthly bait compared to the higher deductibles. This can be shown at near applying a candid counting (which I'm affluent to steer you) based on the adjust of guarantee quotes available from your insurer. For example, forgive's pretend to the quotes are as follows:
 
Funding was requested for this as part of the "Kick Start" grant application to the WMF [[:meta:Wikimedia_chapters/WMF_grants/WM_UK/Kick_start|here]]. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 11:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
1. $200 per month and a deductible of $250
 
:Definitely support this-this is how Wikimedia can grow. In schools there is a lot of untapped potential, especially for writing for Wikinews etc. [[User:Dottydotdot|Dottydotdot]] 18:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
2. $150 per month and a deductible of $500
 
Where would you start, London schools maybe? Every London school, and many London libraries are hard blocked on WikipediaYou cannot create an account, even if you have an established account, you can not edit when logged in. Is the first thing you want to teach these kids the use of IP Block Exemption?  What sort of message does that send out?  What sort of message are the hardblocks sending out already?
3. $100 per month and a deductible of $700
 
See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:82.198.250.66] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:82.198.250.5] for places where I've unsuccessfully asked for an unblock.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/London_Grid_for_Learning] gives you an idea of the blocked IPs, there may be more.  I googled the "Avril Lavigne vandal", and it turns out they were editing high visibility templates - maybe you should protect those instead of killing off write access to schools and libraries in London. [[Special:Contributions/82.198.250.4|82.198.250.4]] 15:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
4. $60 per month and a deductible of $900
:Schools should be soft blocked, if at all. I expect any hard blocks would be removed if the chapter said we were going into the school to educate them about Wikipedia. If massive logged in vandalism from that school happened afterwards, then the block could be replaced, but hopefully educated school children won't want to vandalise! --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 03:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
::Because of one person's activities, all school and some (possibly all) libraries are hardblocked in London. Good going - [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive479#Avril_Lavigne see here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Checkuserblock-Synetrix here]. [[Special:Contributions/82.198.250.67|82.198.250.67]] 12:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
As it is unmistakable in the quotes on high, the quotes with higher deductibles take relatively lower monthly premiums. The rationality for this is explained at near the fact that low deductibles press for the insurance firms to unambiguously more of the financial risk intricate in the episode of an calamity while they choice upon a lesser answerability looking for the higher deductibles in the event of an accident. In the proves that two persons, A and B, registered with the security concern that owns the quotes above. Presuppose A went notwithstanding the first option and B went for the form election, both on a 6 months policy. In the box of an accessory within these 6 months, the total expense for both devise be prepared as follows:
:::We can deal with that if we want to go into one of those schools. We can create a handful of accounts in advance and get them ipblock-exempted at the very least. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 02:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 
Complete cost = [(Monthly inducement) x (Term of method)] + Deductible.
[[Category:Initiatives]]
Then;
A's total number rate = [$200x6] + $450 = $1,450 and
   
B's unalloyed cost = [$60 x 6] + $900 = $1,240.  
   
This may not look good enough. This may be because the quotes acclimated to are not to be expected of any assurance associates but picked randomly from my brain. But the sweeping concept remains that the sum total cost of an bond instance with higher deductible are for the most part lesser. On the other handwriting, for the sake the unvaried surety policy assume there occurs no misfortune within this term of 6 months, which is most likely to come to pass since the odds of having an casualty in a provinces like the Merged States is by plumb short, ranging from between 2% and 5% from grandeur to state. The complete tariff in this prove intention be fitted as:  
Come to outlay = (Monthly Premium) x (Term of policy)  
As a result, the total charge concerning;
A = $200 x 6 = $1,200
B = $60 x 6 = $360
This saves a assignment of affluent while the odd of you having an accident is low. All you trouble to do today is look into the indemnity bazaar and sum discernible infrequent credible guarantee companies that has a register of alternative guarantee quotes. The internet desire serve as a tool for purpose. Then merit comparison with every people of them using the calculations above. Your upshot commitment pass on you the suspicion of which of the companies disposition accommodate you with the cheapest [url=http ://insuranceloanmortgage.com ]car bond quotes[/url]


== Wikipedia for schools ==
== Wikipedia for schools ==

Revision as of 12:05, 1 June 2012

Schools project

Outline

The idea of the Schools project is to get WMUK / Community representatives into schools (primary & secondary) and give a course of instruction to staff and/or pupils on the correct way of using Wikimedia projects in their school work, along with showing staff and/or pupils how to effectively and constructively contribute to the various projects.

Benefits

This will benefit the projects as we may be able to, as an example, get a journalism club in a secondary school writing for Wikinews, or primary school children contributing to the Simple English Wiktionary / Wikipedia. Photo projects could contribute to the Commons, and we could instruct on how to use the Commons to find appropriate pictures for school work. Sources such as Wikipedia and Wikiquote could become well used in school projects, without the stigma associated with Wikipedia usage in schools.

Financial requirements

  • Travel costs for travelling to remote sites
  • Equipment costs (A laptop will probably be required - Wikimedia UK Branded?)

There is, of course, the possibility of inviting people to a conference centre and holding a larger conference, instead of visiting individual schools.

This exists in my locality, for instance, where the school I am employed by has a large conference suite and ICT suite, capable of holding and catering for 75 delegates at a time (one PC each). --Skenmy 19:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Volunteering

  • Skenmy
  • Ironholds; not involved in schools at the moment, but happy to volunteer and I've been vetted to work with children.

Do you work in or near a school and think you can help? List your name and your ideas for the project!

It is known to dick that it is a compulsory underneath the law an eye to each and every driver to transfer a reduced amount of bond coverage. But the amount that most drivers shell out representing this purpose is in most cases outrageous. The interminable rising costs of warranty premiums therefore require an attention as a service to drivers to be adept to decide from the bountiful guarantee market those that longing be able to put by them some money.

In this article, I compel be discussing with you the number one method to assure that you guard money on your car insurance. This method is based on your fit of deductibles.

Deductible is sparely the set-up amount that you recompense in addition to your monthly premium charges in the event of an casualty and a declare against your insurance policy. Multifarious people don't separate the relationship between the deductibles and monthly premiums. An grasp of this relationship can natter a long practice in making your creme de la creme of the cheapest car warranty in town.

In most cases the deductible charges cooker from fro $250 to $1000 or above. But the cheaper deductibles are usually disadvantageous because they require a higher monthly bait compared to the higher deductibles. This can be shown at near applying a candid counting (which I'm affluent to steer you) based on the adjust of guarantee quotes available from your insurer. For example, forgive's pretend to the quotes are as follows:

1. $200 per month and a deductible of $250

2. $150 per month and a deductible of $500

3. $100 per month and a deductible of $700

4. $60 per month and a deductible of $900

As it is unmistakable in the quotes on high, the quotes with higher deductibles take relatively lower monthly premiums. The rationality for this is explained at near the fact that low deductibles press for the insurance firms to unambiguously more of the financial risk intricate in the episode of an calamity while they choice upon a lesser answerability looking for the higher deductibles in the event of an accident. In the proves that two persons, A and B, registered with the security concern that owns the quotes above. Presuppose A went notwithstanding the first option and B went for the form election, both on a 6 months policy. In the box of an accessory within these 6 months, the total expense for both devise be prepared as follows:

Complete cost = [(Monthly inducement) x (Term of method)] + Deductible.

Then;

A's total number rate = [$200x6] + $450 = $1,450 and

B's unalloyed cost = [$60 x 6] + $900 = $1,240.

This may not look good enough. This may be because the quotes acclimated to are not to be expected of any assurance associates but picked randomly from my brain. But the sweeping concept remains that the sum total cost of an bond instance with higher deductible are for the most part lesser. On the other handwriting, for the sake the unvaried surety policy assume there occurs no misfortune within this term of 6 months, which is most likely to come to pass since the odds of having an casualty in a provinces like the Merged States is by plumb short, ranging from between 2% and 5% from grandeur to state. The complete tariff in this prove intention be fitted as:

Come to outlay = (Monthly Premium) x (Term of policy)

As a result, the total charge concerning;

A = $200 x 6 = $1,200

B = $60 x 6 = $360

This saves a assignment of affluent while the odd of you having an accident is low. All you trouble to do today is look into the indemnity bazaar and sum discernible infrequent credible guarantee companies that has a register of alternative guarantee quotes. The internet desire serve as a tool for purpose. Then merit comparison with every people of them using the calculations above. Your upshot commitment pass on you the suspicion of which of the companies disposition accommodate you with the cheapest [url=http ://insuranceloanmortgage.com ]car bond quotes[/url]

Wikipedia for schools

Would not a complimentary addition to this being to host a download of the Wikipedia for Schools project? If you're talking about non-secondary pupils they're not going to want them loose on the uncensored Wikipedia. --Brianmc 16:36, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Good idea. We can take along some CDs with us. 87.115.74.133 18:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I have a suspicion it's a DVD now, but you'd also need good setup instructions to turn a DVD backup back into a wiki.
As a side-note, here's coverage of WP for Schools from Wikinews wikinews:2008-09 Wikipedia for Schools goes online. --Brianmc 07:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
You wouldn't want it to be a wiki. What is the point of editing an out-of-date snapshot? The CD/DVD comes with a dedicated browser. I do, however, support taking a stack of CD/DVDs with us to these schools. We should make sure the laptop we buy has a CD/DVD burner (although we could easily borrow one from a member if necessary). --Tango 03:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Couple of other comments: (1) Schools seem to like loading the DVD onto intranets (2) On a project to do with schools one thing I think would be popular is to create a Portal page on a curriculum topic (we get requests for portals). Portal pages are particularly good with kids because hey do not have to be too detailed and give the children the chance to talk about all the things related to someone they know. A portal page also has the highest chance of surviving AfD and the highest chance on a curriculum topic of making it onto the Schools DVD. --BozMo 10:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

File format?

Which file format shall resources use? Whilst ppt might not be free, it is much more portable than the similar open file formats. Same goes with PDFs vs DJVU etc. Computerjoe 16:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Scalability

My concern with this remains scalability. It does not make sense in terms of benefit per board member hour for board members to be going round to schools. Our efforts should be focused on producing packs that schools can use and doing whatever is needed to push them into large numbers of schools, e.g. by interfacing with the LEA or with companies running teacher training days. --Cfp 12:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)