Talk:Wikipedia Takes Coventry/Upload: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(why not use the wlm system?) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why not use the same system as Wiki Loves Monuments? See [[:commons:Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments upload]] for links to examples. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC) | Why not use the same system as Wiki Loves Monuments? See [[:commons:Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments upload]] for links to examples. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Hi Mike, the "Wiki Takes..." system is not only easier for the uploader to use but is easier for the organisers to set up. Furthermore, it allows us to review all files (ie. make sure it's been called what it actually is) before they're transferred to Commson and automagically calculates overall point values for contestants for us. Regards, [[User:Rock drum|Rock drum]] ([[User talk:Rock drum|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rock drum|contribs]]) 19:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:45, 30 May 2012
Why not use the same system as Wiki Loves Monuments? See commons:Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments upload for links to examples. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Mike, the "Wiki Takes..." system is not only easier for the uploader to use but is easier for the organisers to set up. Furthermore, it allows us to review all files (ie. make sure it's been called what it actually is) before they're transferred to Commson and automagically calculates overall point values for contestants for us. Regards, Rock drum (talk • contribs) 19:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)