Conference Committee/Planning meeting 1/Notes: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎London feedback: remove URL to non-existent page)
Line 28: Line 28:
*: Very good choice of venue; interesting, lots in the venue
*: Very good choice of venue; interesting, lots in the venue
*: Good cultural events program
*: Good cultural events program
*: Pre-conference events; not much on it in the bid b/c is wasn't part of the bid criteria
*: Pre-conference events; not much on it in the bid because it wasn't part of the bid criteria
*: Many accomodation choices
*: Many accomodation choices
*: London First has a person who is specifically incharge of uni accomodation for conferences
*: London First has a person who is specifically in charge of uni accomodation for conferences
* Manchester? http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Wikimania_Bid
* Manchester? http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Wikimania_Bid
*: Good transport links
*: Good transport links

Revision as of 01:21, 14 May 2012

2013 London bid

Hong Kong won. London lost!

Jury is risk averse James F: London was: "Close second" and had a "Bold and ambitious plan"

UK bids feedback

London feedback

  • Chapter support was lukewarm even when there were two UK bids, but nothing really improved after that. But it was noted that WMUK had provided the support that the bid team had asked for.
  • UK chapter has money, but HK chapter dedicated a lot more trustee time towards the bid
  • Chapter needs to detail specific commitments
  • Need to focus on attendees who would be at the lower end of the budget spectrum: get hostels/budget hotels/uni dorms etc. early on
  • Jury liked the Barbican venue - good and well contained

Bristol feedback

  • Bid team didn't turn up to IRC meeting etc.
  • Venues were too spread out - multiple venues not good
  • Crazy expensive to get there - very few direct flights from outside of UK (London, Manchester etc don't have this problem)
  • One Jury answer had to ask the same question 7 different times and got to answer each time

2014 bid

  • Much of the 2013 bid text is reusable
  • Strengths and weaknesses of bid:
    University dorms would have been worthing getting
    210 beds within a few minutes walk
    ~1k beds around London bridge which is a couple stops away
    Very good choice of venue; interesting, lots in the venue
    Good cultural events program
    Pre-conference events; not much on it in the bid because it wasn't part of the bid criteria
    Many accomodation choices
    London First has a person who is specifically in charge of uni accomodation for conferences
  • Manchester? http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Manchester_Wikimania_Bid
    Good transport links
  • Nottingham?
  • Brighton?
  • Birmingham?

Issues to think about

  • Communications
  • Bank account
  • Staff time: Daria?
  • Board role?
  • Time commitment?

Next steps

  • Monthly briefing of the board, staff and community
  • Monthly Skype/conference call
  • Mailing List - Mike Peel
  • Domain name - Mike Peel
  • Google Docs - contact details
  • Joseph Seddon - Committe lead
  • Harry Mitchell - Project Manager - People chaser
  • Ed Saperia - Wikimania 2014 lead
  • Tom Morton ErrantX - Committee Communications
  • Mike Peel - Committee technical lead
  • James Forrester
  • Katie Chan
  • Leutha
  • Rock drum
  • Tom Morris