Talk:Conference Committee/Planning meeting 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(re to Tango) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::OK see you afterwards. BTW a Skype conference call would probably work for this and enable more to participate. [[User:WereSpielChequers|WereSpielChequers]] ([[User talk:WereSpielChequers|talk]]) 19:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | ::OK see you afterwards. BTW a Skype conference call would probably work for this and enable more to participate. [[User:WereSpielChequers|WereSpielChequers]] ([[User talk:WereSpielChequers|talk]]) 19:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::In my experience, skype conference calls don't work with more than about 5 people. The quality is too poor for it to be workable. It's also difficult with too many people because they end up talking over each other. An in person meeting is better. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 20:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | :::In my experience, skype conference calls don't work with more than about 5 people. The quality is too poor for it to be workable. It's also difficult with too many people because they end up talking over each other. An in person meeting is better. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 20:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
::::Yes but you can combine the two - an in person meeting with a skype channel for those who can't get there [[User:WereSpielChequers|WereSpielChequers]] ([[User talk:WereSpielChequers|talk]]) 08:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Apologies == | == Apologies == | ||
* [[User:LoopZilla|LoopZilla]] ([[User talk:LoopZilla|talk]]) 13:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | * [[User:LoopZilla|LoopZilla]] ([[User talk:LoopZilla|talk]]) 13:34, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
* [[User:the wub|the wub]] [[User_talk:The wub|<font color="green">"?!"</font>]] 13:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | * [[User:the wub|the wub]] [[User_talk:The wub|<font color="green">"?!"</font>]] 13:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:18, 5 May 2012
Why are you having this on the same day as a meeting elsewhere in London? Wouldn't it be sensible to have this as a breakout session at the Oak? WereSpielChequers (talk) 12:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Same day, different time. The idea is to have this meeting for a couple of hours in the morning, and e done in time to attend the meetup (perhaps not dead on 13:00, depending on time). There's never going to be a perfect date and time, but this is looking less imperfect than most—even if it keeps a few folks from their beer temporarily. Harry Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- OK see you afterwards. BTW a Skype conference call would probably work for this and enable more to participate. WereSpielChequers (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- In my experience, skype conference calls don't work with more than about 5 people. The quality is too poor for it to be workable. It's also difficult with too many people because they end up talking over each other. An in person meeting is better. --Tango (talk) 20:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes but you can combine the two - an in person meeting with a skype channel for those who can't get there WereSpielChequers (talk) 08:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- In my experience, skype conference calls don't work with more than about 5 people. The quality is too poor for it to be workable. It's also difficult with too many people because they end up talking over each other. An in person meeting is better. --Tango (talk) 20:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- OK see you afterwards. BTW a Skype conference call would probably work for this and enable more to participate. WereSpielChequers (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2012 (UTC)