Talk:Resolutions 12May12b: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(re) |
(reply, on baydon hill) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::The board have approved the deposit institutions as far as I am aware, it's in minuted form on the wiki. [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Richard Symonds]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 13:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC) | ::The board have approved the deposit institutions as far as I am aware, it's in minuted form on the wiki. [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Richard Symonds]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 13:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Good point - also the BaydonHill permissions will need signatory changes. [[User:Jon Davies WMUK|Jon Davies WMUK]] ([[User talk:Jon Davies WMUK|talk]]) 13:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC) | ::Good point - also the BaydonHill permissions will need signatory changes. [[User:Jon Davies WMUK|Jon Davies WMUK]] ([[User talk:Jon Davies WMUK|talk]]) 13:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
::: I'm not sure whether BaydonHill requires a resolution in order to change access rights - it's not a bank account as such, being more a transaction process (analogous to Paypal). Looking at the forms [http://www.baydonhillfx.com/corporate-fx/download-our-forms] they do not appear to require a resolution. So a board decision may be sufficient here. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:23, 2 May 2012
Should these resolutions be round the other way? UT will be our main bank with Coop as standby. Having them on this order could be confusing. Swap them round? Jon Davies WMUK (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Could do. The order doesn't particularly matter, since both will need to be approved at this (board) meeting. There are also some others that we also need to include, e.g. for the deposit accounts. Mike Peel (talk) 11:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Seems ok to me - no "main" bank is specified, & it's typical to deal with existing banks first. But it doesn't matter either way. Has the board formally approved the deposit institutions used already? Johnbod (talk) 12:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- The board have approved the deposit institutions as far as I am aware, it's in minuted form on the wiki. Richard Symonds (talk) 13:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Good point - also the BaydonHill permissions will need signatory changes. Jon Davies WMUK (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure whether BaydonHill requires a resolution in order to change access rights - it's not a bank account as such, being more a transaction process (analogous to Paypal). Looking at the forms [1] they do not appear to require a resolution. So a board decision may be sufficient here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)