2012 Activity Plan/University outreach events: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(First details) |
m (ce) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
;Success Criteria | ;Success Criteria | ||
Agreed plan published that maintains interest and develops new ground. | *Agreed plan published that maintains interest and develops new ground. | ||
*That there is a defined budget. | |||
That there is a defined budget. | *That a range of institutions are selected and co-operate. | ||
That a range of institutions are selected and co-operate. | |||
;Risks | ;Risks | ||
Becomes too disparate to deliver lasting benefits. | *Becomes too disparate to deliver lasting benefits. | ||
*Does not embrace a wide enough range of institutions and project partners. | |||
Does not embrace a wide enough range of institutions and project partners. | |||
Revision as of 18:18, 30 April 2012
- Description
Includes Freshers Fair stalls, Campus Ambassador training events, and other activity with staff & students, including associated volunteer expenses. This year we have trialled a presence at fresher fairs with good results. We need to scale this idea so that we could have a presence at most of the major UK universities next year. At Bristol we also paid for a Wikipedian in residence to investigate the opportunities for academic partnership. We would repeat this elsewhere if we could find another leading educational institution who was willing to champion our cause by use of Campus Ambassadors (or similar.)
- Amount
£20,000
- Budget responsibility
Martin Poulter
- Timetable for activities
Throughout year TBA
- Success Criteria
- Agreed plan published that maintains interest and develops new ground.
- That there is a defined budget.
- That a range of institutions are selected and co-operate.
- Risks
- Becomes too disparate to deliver lasting benefits.
- Does not embrace a wide enough range of institutions and project partners.