WikiConference UK 2012/Elections/Questions/Questions: Difference between revisions
< WikiConference UK 2012 | Elections | Questions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 109.156.180.175 (talk) to last revision by Mathonius) |
(Question on appropriate governance. (Deliberate use of IP to see just for the fun of seeing whether IPs are treated as proper users)) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{WikiCon12/Question|When Wikimedia UK submits information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, is it more important to present Wikimedia in a positive light or to answer questions as accurately and completely as possible even when this might cast WMUK, Wikipedia or the individual answering the questions in a negative light?|[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 16:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)}} | {{WikiCon12/Question|When Wikimedia UK submits information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, is it more important to present Wikimedia in a positive light or to answer questions as accurately and completely as possible even when this might cast WMUK, Wikipedia or the individual answering the questions in a negative light?|[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 16:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
{{WikiCon12/Question|If Wikimedia UK submits information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, and that information subsequently turns out to be inaccurate, incomplete or liable to be interpreted in a manner that places Wikimedia in an overly positive light then what action should WMUK take?|[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 16:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)}} | {{WikiCon12/Question|If Wikimedia UK submits information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, and that information subsequently turns out to be inaccurate, incomplete or liable to be interpreted in a manner that places Wikimedia in an overly positive light then what action should WMUK take?|[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 16:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
{{WikiCon12/Question|As the elected representatives will be charity trustees, have they read and understood the legal requirements and obligations of being a charity trustee and have the current trustees brought these obligations to your attention?|[[Special:Contributions/77.100.19.115|77.100.19.115]] 07:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 08:43, 27 April 2012
- What different groups and communities are you part of? --Filceolaire (talk) 08:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- What motivated you to stand for the board of Wikimedia UK? --Rock drum (talk) 11:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Wikiversity has been set up as a sister project to serve as a platform for Open Educational Resources. Many people feel that it is not really meeting its potential. In light of a serious commitment to education probably emerging from the WMUK Strategic Plan, please name at least one element you feel might help take things forward. --Leutha (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- What projects should WMUK pursue over the next five years. Where should we be in five years time? See Talk:Draft 2012 Five Year Plan/Counterproposal for some ideas. What's your idea? --Filceolaire (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- When Wikimedia UK submits information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, is it more important to present Wikimedia in a positive light or to answer questions as accurately and completely as possible even when this might cast WMUK, Wikipedia or the individual answering the questions in a negative light? --Peter cohen (talk) 16:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- If Wikimedia UK submits information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, and that information subsequently turns out to be inaccurate, incomplete or liable to be interpreted in a manner that places Wikimedia in an overly positive light then what action should WMUK take? --Peter cohen (talk) 16:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- As the elected representatives will be charity trustees, have they read and understood the legal requirements and obligations of being a charity trustee and have the current trustees brought these obligations to your attention? --77.100.19.115 07:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)