User talk:Peter cohen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
cmt |
re |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Peter, I'm concerned about your question in the AGM, which starts "When a trustee or employee of WMUK appears before or corresponds...". It's very complex - essentially three questions in one - and all the candidates will answer 'accuracy' to the first part, as it's the only sensible answer. To that end, I think the question would be best worded as ''"If Wikimedia UK sends information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, and that information subsequently turns out to be inaccurate, then what action should WMUK take?"'' I think this still asks the question you want answered, but this version is more succinct and 'to the point'. Is this OK with you? [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Richard Symonds]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC) | Peter, I'm concerned about your question in the AGM, which starts "When a trustee or employee of WMUK appears before or corresponds...". It's very complex - essentially three questions in one - and all the candidates will answer 'accuracy' to the first part, as it's the only sensible answer. To that end, I think the question would be best worded as ''"If Wikimedia UK sends information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, and that information subsequently turns out to be inaccurate, then what action should WMUK take?"'' I think this still asks the question you want answered, but this version is more succinct and 'to the point'. Is this OK with you? [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Richard Symonds]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Looks fine from my point of view. Thanks for the reply and for rewording :-) [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Richard Symonds]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 11:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:19, 22 April 2012
Peter, I'm concerned about your question in the AGM, which starts "When a trustee or employee of WMUK appears before or corresponds...". It's very complex - essentially three questions in one - and all the candidates will answer 'accuracy' to the first part, as it's the only sensible answer. To that end, I think the question would be best worded as "If Wikimedia UK sends information to the Charity Commission, a parliamentary committee, or another public authority, and that information subsequently turns out to be inaccurate, then what action should WMUK take?" I think this still asks the question you want answered, but this version is more succinct and 'to the point'. Is this OK with you? Richard Symonds (talk) 21:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Looks fine from my point of view. Thanks for the reply and for rewording :-) Richard Symonds (talk) 11:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC)