WikiConference UK 2012/Elections/Questions/Questions: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Restore questions originally asked by User:Filceolaire, User:Rock drum, User:Leutha & User:Peter cohen)
(copyedit grammar, this question may be a little too complex for a simple answer though....)
Line 7: Line 7:


{{WikiCon12/Question|What different groups and communities are you part of?|[[User:Filceolaire|Filceolaire]] ([[User_talk:Filceolaire|talk]]) 08:22, 15 April 2012‎ (UTC)}}
{{WikiCon12/Question|What different groups and communities are you part of?|[[User:Filceolaire|Filceolaire]] ([[User_talk:Filceolaire|talk]]) 08:22, 15 April 2012‎ (UTC)}}
{{WikiCon12/Question|What motivated you to stand for the board of Wikimedia UK?|[[User:Rock drum|Rock drum]] ([[User_talk:Rock drum|talk]]) 11:41, 15 April 2012‎ (UTC)}}
{{WikiCon12/Question|What motivated you to stand for the board of Wikimedia UK?|[[User:Rock drum|Rock drum]] ([[User_talk:Rock drum|talk]]) 11:41, 15 April 2012‎ (UTC)}}
{{WikiCon12/Question|Wikiversity has been set up as a sister project to serve as a platform for Open Educational Resources. Many people feel that it is not really meeting its potential. In light of a serious commitment to education probably emerging from the [[Draft 2012 Five Year Plan|WMUK Strategic Plan]], please name at least one element you feel might help take things forward.|[[User:Leutha|Leutha]] ([[User talk:Leutha|talk]]) 15:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)}}
{{WikiCon12/Question|Wikiversity has been set up as a sister project to serve as a platform for Open Educational Resources. Many people feel that it is not really meeting its potential. In light of a serious commitment to education probably emerging from the [[Draft 2012 Five Year Plan|WMUK Strategic Plan]], please name at least one element you feel might help take things forward.|[[User:Leutha|Leutha]] ([[User talk:Leutha|talk]]) 15:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)}}
 
{{WikiCon12/Question|When a trustee or employee of WMUK appears before or corresponds with a public body such as a parliamentary committee or the Charity Commission is it more important that the information given to that body is accurate, or that it portrays WMUK in a good light? If the former, then what action should WMUK take if it emerges that information given is inaccurate? If the latter, then how do you reconcile this with WMUK's status as a charity receiving tax concessions and other priveleges from the state?|[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 22:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)}}
{{WikiCon12/Question|When a trustee or employee of WMUK appears before or corresponds with a public body such as a parliamentary committee or the Charity Commission is it more important that the information given to that body is accurate or that it portrays WMUK in a good light. If the former, then what action should WMUK take if it emerges that information given is inaccurate. If the latter, then how do you reconcile this with WMUK's status as a charity receiving tax concessions and other priveleges from the state?|[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 22:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 21:29, 19 April 2012


  1. What different groups and communities are you part of? --Filceolaire (talk) 08:22, 15 April 2012‎ (UTC)
  2. What motivated you to stand for the board of Wikimedia UK? --Rock drum (talk) 11:41, 15 April 2012‎ (UTC)
  3. Wikiversity has been set up as a sister project to serve as a platform for Open Educational Resources. Many people feel that it is not really meeting its potential. In light of a serious commitment to education probably emerging from the WMUK Strategic Plan, please name at least one element you feel might help take things forward. --Leutha (talk) 15:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
  4. When a trustee or employee of WMUK appears before or corresponds with a public body such as a parliamentary committee or the Charity Commission is it more important that the information given to that body is accurate, or that it portrays WMUK in a good light? If the former, then what action should WMUK take if it emerges that information given is inaccurate? If the latter, then how do you reconcile this with WMUK's status as a charity receiving tax concessions and other priveleges from the state? --Peter cohen (talk) 22:31, 17 April 2012 (UTC)