Talk:2012 Fundraiser: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(WMF criteria) |
(re) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Have we had any discussions with the WMF since the last fundraiser about how they feel we are doing against the criteria in the Haifa letter? While the WMF board has agreed to allow us to fundraise, it is conditional on us convincing Sue (probably via Barry) that we meet the criteria. It would be worth starting discussions now, if they haven't already started, so that we can make sure we have all the evidence she'll want (I'm confident that we do meet the criteria, but we need to be able to prove it to Sue's satisfaction). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 11:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | Have we had any discussions with the WMF since the last fundraiser about how they feel we are doing against the criteria in the Haifa letter? While the WMF board has agreed to allow us to fundraise, it is conditional on us convincing Sue (probably via Barry) that we meet the criteria. It would be worth starting discussions now, if they haven't already started, so that we can make sure we have all the evidence she'll want (I'm confident that we do meet the criteria, but we need to be able to prove it to Sue's satisfaction). --[[User:Tango|Tango]] ([[User talk:Tango|talk]]) 11:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Word on the street is that we tend to rely on them a bit too much for technical support - we currently use the WMF's OTRS installation, for example, rather than our own. Other than that they are generally quite happy with our arrangements, but I'm sure Chris has more answers than me. [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Richard Symonds]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|talk]]) 11:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:32, 17 April 2012
Have we had any discussions with the WMF since the last fundraiser about how they feel we are doing against the criteria in the Haifa letter? While the WMF board has agreed to allow us to fundraise, it is conditional on us convincing Sue (probably via Barry) that we meet the criteria. It would be worth starting discussions now, if they haven't already started, so that we can make sure we have all the evidence she'll want (I'm confident that we do meet the criteria, but we need to be able to prove it to Sue's satisfaction). --Tango (talk) 11:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Word on the street is that we tend to rely on them a bit too much for technical support - we currently use the WMF's OTRS installation, for example, rather than our own. Other than that they are generally quite happy with our arrangements, but I'm sure Chris has more answers than me. Richard Symonds (talk) 11:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)