Talk:Agenda 21Apr12: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(signing up)
 
(reply to Rexx)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Visitors ==
== Visitors ==
As suggested at [[m:Meetup/Monmouth/1]], I'd be interested to sit in on any public sessions of the Board, since I'll be in Monmouth for the meetup on Saturday 21. Unfortunately, I can't find a good place to sign up, so I'm leaving a note here. By the way, have you seen the edit notice for this page? It must be excruciating for anybody with a hangover. Cheers, --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 00:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
As suggested at [[m:Meetup/Monmouth/1]], I'd be interested to sit in on any public sessions of the Board, since I'll be in Monmouth for the meetup on Saturday 21. Unfortunately, I can't find a good place to sign up, so I'm leaving a note here. By the way, have you seen the edit notice for this page? It must be excruciating for anybody with a hangover. Cheers, --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 00:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
: Great. :-) Stating interest here was probably the best approach to take. You're more than welcome to attend any part of the agenda you are interested in, with the exception of 'in-camera' sessions that may be trustees+staff-only or trustees-only. The default is that our sessions are public unless stated otherwise.
: The edit notice is indeed very ugly. If anyone can figure out where it's being set, then please make it look better!
: Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 23:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:55, 6 March 2012

Visitors

As suggested at m:Meetup/Monmouth/1, I'd be interested to sit in on any public sessions of the Board, since I'll be in Monmouth for the meetup on Saturday 21. Unfortunately, I can't find a good place to sign up, so I'm leaving a note here. By the way, have you seen the edit notice for this page? It must be excruciating for anybody with a hangover. Cheers, --RexxS (talk) 00:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Great. :-) Stating interest here was probably the best approach to take. You're more than welcome to attend any part of the agenda you are interested in, with the exception of 'in-camera' sessions that may be trustees+staff-only or trustees-only. The default is that our sessions are public unless stated otherwise.
The edit notice is indeed very ugly. If anyone can figure out where it's being set, then please make it look better!
Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 23:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)