User talk:Rich Farmbrough: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+ cm) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Some of those templates are little use without all their CSS from [[w:en:Mediawiki:Common.css]]. {{tl|Navbox}} is a good example of that. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] 13:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | :::Some of those templates are little use without all their CSS from [[w:en:Mediawiki:Common.css]]. {{tl|Navbox}} is a good example of that. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] 13:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::True. (But also false - they do at least show what they are supposed to do, sans style.) It's a problem with abstracting style away to that extent - encapsulation fails even as data hiding succeeds. Maybe we should import the CSS. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>22:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC).</small><br /> | ::::True. (But also false - they do at least show what they are supposed to do, sans style.) It's a problem with abstracting style away to that extent - encapsulation fails even as data hiding succeeds. Maybe we should import the CSS. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]] [[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', <small>22:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC).</small><br /> | ||
::::: Go for it - please suggest relevant additions to the CSS page at [[MediaWiki talk:Common.css]]. :-) [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 00:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:19, 20 December 2011
Best to look at en:Rich Farmbroughen:Rich Farmbrough
Templates
Hi Rich, do you actually have a use for those templates you're importing? It's just that this wiki isn't for hosting content, it's just for discussion and organisation of chapter matters. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
All were from Special:WantedTemplates. Rich Farmbrough, 01:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC).
- Interesting. I didn't know there was such a list, but if the templates have a use, carry on. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- Some of those templates are little use without all their CSS from w:en:Mediawiki:Common.css. {{Navbox}} is a good example of that. -- WOSlinker 13:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- True. (But also false - they do at least show what they are supposed to do, sans style.) It's a problem with abstracting style away to that extent - encapsulation fails even as data hiding succeeds. Maybe we should import the CSS. Rich Farmbrough, 22:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC).
- Go for it - please suggest relevant additions to the CSS page at MediaWiki talk:Common.css. :-) Mike Peel 00:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- True. (But also false - they do at least show what they are supposed to do, sans style.) It's a problem with abstracting style away to that extent - encapsulation fails even as data hiding succeeds. Maybe we should import the CSS. Rich Farmbrough, 22:17, 19 December 2011 (UTC).
- Some of those templates are little use without all their CSS from w:en:Mediawiki:Common.css. {{Navbox}} is a good example of that. -- WOSlinker 13:12, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting. I didn't know there was such a list, but if the templates have a use, carry on. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)