Talk:Minutes 2014-09-19: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The category uses a sort key, in this case so that the pages in the category are listed in date order. This would have been more useful when the format was in the form 'Minutes (month) (year)' but with the date in the format 2014-09-19 it effectively does it by default. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:02, 22 September 2015 (BST) | :The category uses a sort key, in this case so that the pages in the category are listed in date order. This would have been more useful when the format was in the form 'Minutes (month) (year)' but with the date in the format 2014-09-19 it effectively does it by default. [[User:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|Richard Nevell (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Richard Nevell (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:02, 22 September 2015 (BST) | ||
I get what you mean, but "2" is a bit void of meaning. If there was no piping all the agendas would be together, then all the minutes and then all reports. The piping adds an exfra level of complication which might discourage from volunteer help out with this? [[User:Leutha|Leutha]] ([[User talk:Leutha|talk]]) 20:39, 22 September 2015 (BST) | I get what you mean, but "2" is a bit void of meaning. If there was no piping all the agendas would be together, then all the minutes and then all reports. The piping adds an exfra level of complication which might [[Reports_2015-09-12#The_state_of_the_charity.27s_wiki|discourage from volunteer help out with this]]? [[User:Leutha|Leutha]] ([[User talk:Leutha|talk]]) 20:39, 22 September 2015 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 19:41, 22 September 2015
Categorisation
Is there a reason why these minutes are categorised only with date? This means they come up in the category as "2"? But this has not been done consistently.? Leutha (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2015 (BST)
- The category uses a sort key, in this case so that the pages in the category are listed in date order. This would have been more useful when the format was in the form 'Minutes (month) (year)' but with the date in the format 2014-09-19 it effectively does it by default. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 15:02, 22 September 2015 (BST)
I get what you mean, but "2" is a bit void of meaning. If there was no piping all the agendas would be together, then all the minutes and then all reports. The piping adds an exfra level of complication which might discourage from volunteer help out with this? Leutha (talk) 20:39, 22 September 2015 (BST)