Talk:Press releases/Ofqual report: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Articles covering this story: + Times) |
(→Articles covering this story: sorry ... telegraph not times) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6943325/Schoolchildren-told-to-avoid-Wikipedia.html Telegraph] | * [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6943325/Schoolchildren-told-to-avoid-Wikipedia.html Telegraph] | ||
* [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5h-XlAS4YCNvyUIDE8w7ZjYIagGWw UKPA] | * [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5h-XlAS4YCNvyUIDE8w7ZjYIagGWw UKPA] | ||
* [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6944035/Should-Google-be-used-for-homework.html | * [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/6944035/Should-Google-be-used-for-homework.html Telegraph (take 2)] | ||
Revision as of 23:58, 6 January 2010
Do you really think the Telegraph would do anything in response to such a letter? --Tango 20:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- They might publish a letter to the Editor. Mike Peel 20:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- True. We should probably do both, then. --Tango 20:56, 6 January 2010 (UTC)