Main Page: Difference between revisions
(typos) |
(Update blog post) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|advert= | |advert= | ||
|blog post= | |blog post= | ||
; | ;What would London look like without Freedom of Panorama? A letter to MEPs | ||
''The letter below was sent to all UK MEPs on 2 July signed by Michael Maggs, Chair of Wikimedia UK'' | |||
[[File:Tower Bridge view at dawn FOP.jpg|thumb|center|600px|<small>© User:Colin Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0</small>]] | |||
''' | <center><big><big>'''What would London look like without Freedom of Panorama?'''</big></big></center> | ||
<center><big>'''Who would you need to seek permission from before photographing the skyline?'''</big></center> | |||
Dear MEP | |||
I’m writing from Wikimedia UK, the leading UK charity dedicated to providing free knowledge for all and to supporting Wikipedia. I want to ask for your support in protecting the right of photographers and film makers to take pictures of buildings and sculptures in public spaces, and to do what they like with their own images without having to seek permission from any third party copyright owner. This is known as Freedom of Panorama, and it has been a fundamental freedom we in the UK have enjoyed for over a century – a freedom first enshrined in the 1911 Copyright Act. | |||
Freedom of Panorama rights are enjoyed in the majority of EU states, but in a few such as France, Italy and Belgium photographers and film makers have to obtain third party copyright licences and pay fees before they can work in public areas. I want to bring to your attention an attempt by some of your fellow MEPs to harmonise European law to a French-style system of royalties on public spaces. These royalties create funding streams for certain local and regional copyright fee collection societies who are supporting this attempt. | |||
In her own-initiative report on copyright harmonisation, Julia Reda sensibly proposed harmonising full Freedom of Panorama across all EU states. Unfortunately, her proposal has been utterly subverted by M Cavada’s AM 421: | |||
{{quote|16. Considers that the '''commercial''' use of photographs, video footage or other images of works which are permanently located in physical public places should '''always be subject to prior authorisation from the authors or any proxy acting for them'''}} | |||
This amendment would be disastrous. Although its proponents argue that ordinary citizens are non-commercial and would not need to seek licences, that is incorrect. Many citizens use Facebook, Tumblr and other commercial social media sites, and uploads to such sites would put photographers at legal risk, even if no money changes hands. | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2015/07/what-would-london-look-like-without-freedom-of-panorama-a-letter-to-meps/<nowiki>[</nowiki>Continues...<nowiki>]</nowiki>]</span> | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2015/ | |||
|events=<!--Aim to have between 8 and 10 events listed to avoid this section taking up too much or to little space--> | |events=<!--Aim to have between 8 and 10 events listed to avoid this section taking up too much or to little space--> |
Revision as of 13:20, 3 July 2015
Cymraeg | English
Wikimedia UK
|
|
Для української мови Вікіпедії ласка, відвідайте http://uk.wikipedia.org; для Вікімедіа Україна відвідайте http://ua.wikimedia.org
For the Ukrainian language Wikipedia please visit http://uk.wikipedia.org; for Wikimedia Ukraine please visit http://ua.wikimedia.org
Want to suggest changes to the content and presentation of this page? Comment on the talk page, or experiment at the Sandbox