User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 231: Line 231:
*Daily Mail [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2971822/John-Howard-ranks-world-s-controversial-topics-Wikipedia.html Retread of the SMH article, but with a headline covering five lines]
*Daily Mail [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2971822/John-Howard-ranks-world-s-controversial-topics-Wikipedia.html Retread of the SMH article, but with a headline covering five lines]
*Financial Times [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3f726eba-bb6f-11e4-b95c-00144feab7de.html Editors for hire on Wikipedia] Decent enough piece looking at paid editing
*Financial Times [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3f726eba-bb6f-11e4-b95c-00144feab7de.html Editors for hire on Wikipedia] Decent enough piece looking at paid editing
*Wired (US version) [http://www.wired.com/2015/03/wikipedia-sexism/ Meet the editors fighting racism and sexism on Wikipedia]
*Slate blog [http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/03/06/the_gamergate_wars_over_wikipedia_show_that_wikipedia_s_neutrality_measure.html On Wikipedia, GamerGate refuses to die]
*Spectator {http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/steerpike/2015/03/mystery-surrounds-tory-mps-wikipedia-page/ Has a Tory MP been editing his own Wikipedia page?] Story about Calder Valley MP Craig Whittaker's staff editing his Wikipedia article from Parliament.





Revision as of 15:44, 9 March 2015

List of press coverage from August to October 2014

Wikimania

Wikipedia and Wikimedia related (key stories only)

Wikimedia UK directly created or quoted