User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 230: | Line 230: | ||
*Sydney Morning Herald [http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sex-religion-and-john-howard-wikipedias-most-controversial-pages-20150224-13n084.html Sex, religion and John Howard - Wikipedia's most controversial pages] - retread of an old piece listing the most tendentious articles on Wikipedia. | *Sydney Morning Herald [http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sex-religion-and-john-howard-wikipedias-most-controversial-pages-20150224-13n084.html Sex, religion and John Howard - Wikipedia's most controversial pages] - retread of an old piece listing the most tendentious articles on Wikipedia. | ||
*Daily Mail [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2971822/John-Howard-ranks-world-s-controversial-topics-Wikipedia.html Retread of the SMH article, but with a headline covering five lines] | *Daily Mail [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2971822/John-Howard-ranks-world-s-controversial-topics-Wikipedia.html Retread of the SMH article, but with a headline covering five lines] | ||
*Financial Times [http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3f726eba-bb6f-11e4-b95c-00144feab7de.html Editors for hire on Wikipedia] Decent enough piece looking at paid editing | |||