User:Stevie Benton (WMUK)/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 227: Line 227:
*PopMatters [http://www.popmatters.com/feature/190800-wikipedia-controversy-and-the-myth-of-neutrality/ Wikipedia controversy and the myth of neutrality] Thoughtful piece looking at GamerGate (does a good job) and the broader issue of communications in tech lacking neutrality (particularly in terms of gender).
*PopMatters [http://www.popmatters.com/feature/190800-wikipedia-controversy-and-the-myth-of-neutrality/ Wikipedia controversy and the myth of neutrality] Thoughtful piece looking at GamerGate (does a good job) and the broader issue of communications in tech lacking neutrality (particularly in terms of gender).
*Croydon Advertiser [http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/EXCLUSIVE-Aide-admits-removing-unfair-entry-MP-s/story-26052827-detail/story.html Aide admits removing 'unfair' entry on MP's Wikipedia page] An aide to an MP has removed a link to a satirical article in the MP's BLP.
*Croydon Advertiser [http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/EXCLUSIVE-Aide-admits-removing-unfair-entry-MP-s/story-26052827-detail/story.html Aide admits removing 'unfair' entry on MP's Wikipedia page] An aide to an MP has removed a link to a satirical article in the MP's BLP.
*Vox [http://www.vox.com/2015/2/23/8078973/hg-wells-wikipedia HG Wells predicted Wikipedia in 1937]
*Sydney Morning Herald [http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sex-religion-and-john-howard-wikipedias-most-controversial-pages-20150224-13n084.html Sex, religion and John Howard - Wikipedia's most controversial pages] - retread of an old piece listing the most tendentious articles on Wikipedia.





Revision as of 16:37, 24 February 2015

List of press coverage from August to October 2014

Wikimania

Wikipedia and Wikimedia related (key stories only)

Wikimedia UK directly created or quoted