Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Update blog post) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|advert= | |advert= | ||
|blog post= | |blog post= | ||
; | ;Report from the Speaker’s Commission on Digital Democracy | ||
[[File:Palace of Westminster.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The Palace of Westminster, home of Parliament]] | |||
''This post was written by Stevie Benton, Head of External Relations'' | |||
This morning I attended the launch of Open Up! – Report of the Speaker’s Commission on Digital Democracy. Having been [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Connecting_knowledge_to_power:_the_future_of_digital_democracy_in_the_UK_(Archive_1) involved in the work of the Commission] I was very interested to hear its recommendations. | |||
[http://www.digitaldemocracy.parliament.uk/documents/Open-Up-Digital-Democracy-Report.pdf The report is a substantial document (PDF)] which I need to read in more detail, but there are five key targets and recommendations highlighted in the summary (P3 of the report). Some of these appear to be significant wins for the open knowledge movement. These are quoted below: | |||
*By 2020, the House of Commons should ensure that everyone can understand what it does | |||
*By 2020, Parliament should be fully interactive and digital | |||
*The 2015 newly elected House of Commons should create immediately a new forum for public participation in the debating function of the House of Commons | |||
*By 2020 secure online voting should be an option for all voters | |||
*By 2016 all published information and broadcast footage produced by Parliament should be freely available online in formats suitable for re-use. Hansard should be available as open data by the end of 2015. | |||
<span class="plainlinks">[https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2015/01/ | It is the final recommendation that is of most interest here, and I’ll address this first. I very much welcome this step to make more of Parliament’s information freely available, especially as this is already paid for from the public purse, although the choice of open license is crucial to the impact this move will have. I encourage Parliament to use the most open license possible. For example, the use of the [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Open Government Licence] would allow for footage of parliamentary debates to be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and inserted into appropriate Wikipedia articles. I find this quite exciting and it would enhance Wikipedia as a learning and teaching tool for those interested in Parliament. | ||
<span class="plainlinks">[https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2015/01/report-from-the-speakers-commission-on-digital-democracy/<nowiki>[</nowiki>Read the full post here, which continues here...<nowiki>]</nowiki>]</span> | |||
|events=<!--Aim to have between 8 and 10 events listed to avoid this section taking up too much or to little space--> | |events=<!--Aim to have between 8 and 10 events listed to avoid this section taking up too much or to little space--> |
Revision as of 16:54, 26 January 2015
Cymraeg | English
Wikimedia UK
|
|
Для української мови Вікіпедії ласка, відвідайте http://uk.wikipedia.org; для Вікімедіа Україна відвідайте http://ua.wikimedia.org
For the Ukrainian language Wikipedia please visit http://uk.wikipedia.org; for Wikimedia Ukraine please visit http://ua.wikimedia.org
Want to suggest changes to the content and presentation of this page? Comment on the talk page, or experiment at the Sandbox