Talk:AGM 2014/Resolutions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Motion about Fæ's membership) |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (→Motion about Fæ's membership: We will provide feedback before the AGM, but please understand that we cannot enter into open discussion here about the pros and cons of the decision itself) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Motion about Fæ's membership == | == Motion about Fæ's membership == | ||
Hi all. I've somewhat reluctantly proposed a motion about Fæ's membership status, since I think this decision and the rationale that led to it are worth reconsidering. I'd like to encourage the board to reconsider this decision before the AGM - if it can be resolved amicably before the AGM then I'd be happy to consider retracting the motion. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 17:35, 29 June 2014 (BST) | Hi all. I've somewhat reluctantly proposed a motion about Fæ's membership status, since I think this decision and the rationale that led to it are worth reconsidering. I'd like to encourage the board to reconsider this decision before the AGM - if it can be resolved amicably before the AGM then I'd be happy to consider retracting the motion. Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 17:35, 29 June 2014 (BST) | ||
:Mike - noted. Just to say that the board takes this draft resolution seriously. We will provide feedback before the AGM, but please understand that we cannot enter into open discussion here about the pros and cons of the decision itself. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 18:23, 29 June 2014 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 18:23, 29 June 2014
Motion about Fæ's membership
Hi all. I've somewhat reluctantly proposed a motion about Fæ's membership status, since I think this decision and the rationale that led to it are worth reconsidering. I'd like to encourage the board to reconsider this decision before the AGM - if it can be resolved amicably before the AGM then I'd be happy to consider retracting the motion. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:35, 29 June 2014 (BST)
- Mike - noted. Just to say that the board takes this draft resolution seriously. We will provide feedback before the AGM, but please understand that we cannot enter into open discussion here about the pros and cons of the decision itself. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2014 (BST)