Talk:Transparency: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(comment) |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) (added) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It might (or might not) be worth noting that reasons for a request being refused will be given where possible. For example if the cost of X is asked for in good faith but this is not possible to provide because the charity paid for X, Y and Z as one item, I think it reasonable to explain this to the requester. [[User:Chris McKenna (WMUK)|Chris McKenna (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Chris McKenna (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:22, 20 June 2014 (BST) | It might (or might not) be worth noting that reasons for a request being refused will be given where possible. For example if the cost of X is asked for in good faith but this is not possible to provide because the charity paid for X, Y and Z as one item, I think it reasonable to explain this to the requester. [[User:Chris McKenna (WMUK)|Chris McKenna (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Chris McKenna (WMUK)|talk]]) 10:22, 20 June 2014 (BST) | ||
:Certainly. Added. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] ([[User talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 11:56, 20 June 2014 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:56, 20 June 2014
It might (or might not) be worth noting that reasons for a request being refused will be given where possible. For example if the cost of X is asked for in good faith but this is not possible to provide because the charity paid for X, Y and Z as one item, I think it reasonable to explain this to the requester. Chris McKenna (WMUK) (talk) 10:22, 20 June 2014 (BST)
- Certainly. Added. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2014 (BST)