Talk:Project grants/Genetics data edit-a-thon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Create) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
Hi Suraj, thank you for your application. The members of the [[Grants Committee]] will get back to you soon with any comments they may have. -- [[User:Katie Chan (WMUK)|Katie Chan (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Katie Chan (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:51, 28 April 2014 (BST) | Hi Suraj, thank you for your application. The members of the [[Grants Committee]] will get back to you soon with any comments they may have. -- [[User:Katie Chan (WMUK)|Katie Chan (WMUK)]] ([[User talk:Katie Chan (WMUK)|talk]]) 15:51, 28 April 2014 (BST) | ||
:This sounds good and looks like reasonable cost, I also see the timescale is short so I hope we can respond quickly. It would, though, be good to have some clarification re: whether the proposal is to add new articles (or other content) or if it's to strengthen ties between articles (improving their quality), etc. and if you have a set of target articles in advance. Cheers [[User:Sjgknight|Sjgknight]] ([[User talk:Sjgknight|talk]]) 16:51, 28 April 2014 (BST) |
Revision as of 16:51, 28 April 2014
Discussion
Hi Suraj, thank you for your application. The members of the Grants Committee will get back to you soon with any comments they may have. -- Katie Chan (WMUK) (talk) 15:51, 28 April 2014 (BST)
- This sounds good and looks like reasonable cost, I also see the timescale is short so I hope we can respond quickly. It would, though, be good to have some clarification re: whether the proposal is to add new articles (or other content) or if it's to strengthen ties between articles (improving their quality), etc. and if you have a set of target articles in advance. Cheers Sjgknight (talk) 16:51, 28 April 2014 (BST)