Meetings/2009-07-21/Agenda/Chair's Report: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(report)
 
(+ blog suggestion)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Activities ==
# Attended the launch of [http://www.bbc.co.uk/digitalrevolution/ BBC Digital Revolution] at the BBC in London on 10 July 2009 on behalf of the chapter
# Attended the launch of [http://www.bbc.co.uk/digitalrevolution/ BBC Digital Revolution] at the BBC in London on 10 July 2009 on behalf of the chapter
# Will be participating in a [http://www.scienceonlinelondon.org/ Science Online London] panel session on 22 August 2009, entitled "Citizen science - How the Web enables anyone to be a scientist", but also focusing on communication of science.
# Will be participating in a [http://www.scienceonlinelondon.org/ Science Online London] panel session on 22 August 2009, entitled "Citizen science - How the Web enables anyone to be a scientist", but also focusing on communication of science.
# Have been introduced to the head of [http://www.thepcf.org.uk/ The Public Catalogue Foundation], and will likely be invited to a symposium on "Pictures in Public – Digital Connections between Collections, Researchers and the Public" in Oxford in September (along with potentially Tom?)
# Have been introduced to the head of [http://www.thepcf.org.uk/ The Public Catalogue Foundation], and will likely be invited to a symposium on "Pictures in Public – Digital Connections between Collections, Researchers and the Public" in Oxford in September (along with potentially Tom?)
== Blog ==
Via email I suggested the creation of a WMUK blog. The pros/cons that I can think of are below; please feel free to add comments
Pros:
# Useful for releasing smallish items of news that are possibly bigger than just a post to a mailing list, but smaller than a press release (e.g. the Twitter survey results, WMF grant, etc.)
# Great for getting user feedback (everyone knows how to leave a comment on a blog)
# Additional line of communication in addition to mailing list/wiki/newsletter, easily to subscribe to and for others to find
# Easy to tie into other means of communication - e.g. Twitter
Cons:
# Needs to be kept up to date
# Another job to do (but can be distributed to all board members)
# Content needs to be appropriate, timely and informative - not easy
Useful facts:
# Blogs are currently used by [http://blog.wikimedia.org The WMF] (also [http://techblog.wikimedia.org technical]), [http://blog.wikimedia.fr/ WMFR] and [http://blog.wikimedia.de/ WMDE] (any more?)

Revision as of 23:29, 20 July 2009

Activities

  1. Attended the launch of BBC Digital Revolution at the BBC in London on 10 July 2009 on behalf of the chapter
  2. Will be participating in a Science Online London panel session on 22 August 2009, entitled "Citizen science - How the Web enables anyone to be a scientist", but also focusing on communication of science.
  3. Have been introduced to the head of The Public Catalogue Foundation, and will likely be invited to a symposium on "Pictures in Public – Digital Connections between Collections, Researchers and the Public" in Oxford in September (along with potentially Tom?)

Blog

Via email I suggested the creation of a WMUK blog. The pros/cons that I can think of are below; please feel free to add comments

Pros:

  1. Useful for releasing smallish items of news that are possibly bigger than just a post to a mailing list, but smaller than a press release (e.g. the Twitter survey results, WMF grant, etc.)
  2. Great for getting user feedback (everyone knows how to leave a comment on a blog)
  3. Additional line of communication in addition to mailing list/wiki/newsletter, easily to subscribe to and for others to find
  4. Easy to tie into other means of communication - e.g. Twitter

Cons:

  1. Needs to be kept up to date
  2. Another job to do (but can be distributed to all board members)
  3. Content needs to be appropriate, timely and informative - not easy

Useful facts:

  1. Blogs are currently used by The WMF (also technical), WMFR and WMDE (any more?)